ShareThis

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

ICS puts shipowners case at UN Climate Change Conference - ICS - hellenicshippingnews.com

Posted - Wednesday, 30 November 2011 | 00:00 - ICS - hellenicshippingnews.com

The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) - the principal international trade association for ship operators representing all sectors and trades and over 80% of the world merchant fleet - has called on delegates at the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 17) in Durban, to give the International Maritime Organization (IMO) a clear mandate to continue its work on regulating shipping's CO2 emissions, including the development of Market Based Measures.
ICS explained that shipping is committed to improving efficiency per tonne-km by 20% by 2020 with further significant improvements thereafter, and that the achievement of this goal would be greatly assisted by the recent IMO agreement on technical regulations to reduce shipping's emissions.
Speaking alongside IMO officials on 29 November at a special UNFCCC event on international transport, ICS Director of External Relations, Simon Bennett, said that it was "no secret that Market Based Measures are controversial. However the shipping industry recognizes that the need to prevent climate change is a political challenge as much as a technical one, and that shipping needs to play a constructive part in the discussion about MBMs."
As demonstrated by the recent IMO agreement on technical measures, ICS believes that IMO is eminently capable of continuing its discussions on Market Based Measures which, if governments so decided, could also involve a linkage to any 'Green Fund' that is established by UNFCCC.
However, ICS suggested that the high cost of fuel means that shipowners already have every incentive to improve their efficiency. Governments must also avoid the possibility of modal shift since if excessive costs are added to shipping there could be greater use of less carbon efficient shore-based transport modes which would generate additional CO2.

 Complete post at:
http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/en-gb/News.aspx?ElementId=87132cfd-7515-4c8e-b57a-fdcb8819e866TopOfBlogs

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Shipping sector may accept price on CO2 emissions - AFP (Google News)

Posted - November 29, 2011 -  AFP (Google News)

DURBAN, South Africa — The world shipping industry could accept a global levy on carbon emissions from merchant ships under a deal that would also channel proceeds to poor countries, according to an announcement at the UN climate talks on Tuesday.
Maritime transport accounts for roughly three percent of world emissions of greenhouse gases.
But, like the aviation industry, it does not have any targeted curbs on this pollution, an omission that green campaigners are fighting to change.
In a joint statement, the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), WWF and Oxfam said carbon emissions from merchant ships could be subjected to "market-based measures" as an incentive to reduce greenhouse gases.
Part of the revenue from this could go to a planned Green Climate Fund that, in theory, will provide up to 100 billion dollars a year for developing countries most at risk from climate change.
WWF's director of international climate policy, Keya Chatterjee, said the deal was "an agreement in principle" and some details, including the carbon price, needed to be hammered out in further negotiations in the UN's specialized shipping organization.
The ICS, which accounts for more than 80 percent of the world's merchant fleet, prefers a straightforward levy but the WWF could accept other options, she said.
Chatterjee described the accord as a breakthrough.
Failing to factor in the cost of fossil-fuel pollution from transport was "a subsidy... an enormous failure," she told AFP.
The announcement was made on the second day of talks in Durban under the 194-nation UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Complete Post at:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jIK186djlhzanUJUK-W7GgdYwJVw?docId=CNG.51fd675c802c00ccf6a4fb87f46cd12d.871TopOfBlogs

Trade issues in the spotlight on the eve of COP 17 - ICTSD

Posted -  Volume 5Number 4 • November 2011 - ICTSD

One word can sum up the outlook for the Durban Conference of the Parties (COP) this year: uncertainty. But that may not be all bad. Last year’s meeting in Cancun, Mexico showed us all that sometimes low expectations may be the best way to get results at climate negotiations. Jump back a year further to 2009, when many observers said that parties meeting in Copenhagen, Denmark, were poised to deliver a new binding treaty for climate change cooperation. Instead, great expectations resulted in a mighty flop.
Disappointment in Copenhagen cost many global leaders a good deal of political capital – leaving them unwilling to make such a gamble the following year. But whether pre-COP doldrums prove to be a magic formula for lifting the fog at UNFCCC COPs remains to be seen. The show bill for this year includes several overview agendas and an array of unfinished texts, making it impossible to tell how this year’s climate spectacle will unfold.
Future of Kyoto up in the air
By all accounts, the headliner at this year’s COP is the Kyoto Protocol. Signed in 1997, the Protocol’s first and, to date, only period of implementation – “commitment period” in climate parlance – began in 2008 and will end in 2012. The Protocol envisages a second commitment period, and countries have spent over a decade negotiating the finer details of what the future of the Protocol would be. An array of influencing elements has derailed progress on the next term’s negotiations, and only a handful of redeeming qualities may keep the agreement alive.

Complete Post at:
http://ictsd.org/i/news/bioresreview/119747/TopOfBlogs

Interferry claims low-sulphur timetable is ‘mission impossible - hellenicshippingnews.com

 Posted - Tuesday, 29 November 2011 -

Trade association Interferry says that ferry operators in northern Europe face a near-impossible choice in trying to meet the 2015 deadline for ultra-low sulphur emissions from bunker fuel.The association also warns that the low-sulphur legislation will prompt an environmentally damaging modal shift from short-sea to overland transport and pose severe financial implications for the overall European economy.Under pending IMO and soon to be agreed European Union (EU) environmental requirements, vessels operating in the Baltic, North Sea and Channel Emission Control Areas (ECAs) will have to comply with a 0.1% limit on fuel sulphur content.
Interferry says it acknowledges ferry operators’ responsibility to reduce emissions and supports the move to lower sulphur limits globally by 2020 - but claims that the 2015 timescale is ‘mission impossible´ due to unsustainable cost increases. It argues that, despite the ferry industry’s efforts to develop alternative technologies and feasible alternative fuels, abatement technologies and financial support will not be available or sufficient enough to avoid a modal shift from sea to road. These alternatives are the elements in a ‘toolbox’ of technical and financial solutions proposed by the European Commission (EC).
The toolbox suggests the use of ‘clean’ LNG fuel or, for vessels that continue to run on heavy fuel oil, the use of scrubbers - exhaust gas cleaning systems. It also points operators towards EU funding initiatives and state aid. Interferry responds that these are not realistic options because:
• it is widely recognized in Europe that LNG is only an option for new vessels due to the prohibitive cost of converting existing vessels, and in any case the LNG fuel supply infrastructure is inadequate
• scrubber technology is not a ‘miracle cure’. The association notes that ferry operators are pleased to have contributed financially and operationally in developing the technology and says it is a solution that seems to be able to remove sulphur particles from the exhaust gases on some ships. However, a new Interferry feasibility study covering 108 vessels from six leading operators reveals that scrubbers would not be technically or financially viable for 60% of the existing fleet. Furthermore, trial installations among association members have shown that it will not be possible to have scrubbers in operation in time for 2015 for the other 40%

Complete post at:
http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/en-gb/News.aspx?ElementId=e47bcf0d-17c2-433b-882d-fd56f463820dTopOfBlogs

Monday, November 28, 2011

New environmental marine regulations to impact shipping in 2012 - hellenicshippingnews.com

Posted - Monday, 28 November 2011 | 17:27 - hellenicshippingnews.com

August of next year will see some major changes for marine navigation. It’s when the North American ECA will come into force, introducing a 1% sulphur restriction, in line with the Baltic and North Sea Emission Control Areas (ECAs). According to London-based shipbrokers Gibson, this change is expected to have a significant impact on shipping. “The sulphur level in all ECAs is due to be further reduced to a 0.1% sulphur fuel limit from January 2015, which again is likely to have a major impact. Beyond this, the next major issue is the proposed IMO legislation shifting all bunkers to less than 0.5% sulphur, due to be introduced globally in 2020. However, it is highly unlikely that there will be sufficient availability of low sulphur fuel oil to meet this requirement by 2020 and the IMOs review process planned for 2018 is almost certain to delay the introduction of this low sulphur requirement until 2025.
At this time the reduction could leave owners with the decision to effectively rule out the use of all residual fuel, switching to low sulphur fuels such as distillate (with even LNG being discussed). However, the use of new technologies like scrubbers to meet the strict sulphur regulations may offer an alternative, although pilot projects suggest that current solutions may not yet be commercially viable. Nonetheless, with low sulphur prices as much as $80/tonne above high sulphur earlier this year, there could be a strong economic incentive to push these new technologies forward. Whilst there is huge uncertainty surrounding the scale of impact on shipping, it appears the only certainty is that this issue is not going to go away” said Gibson in its latest weekly report.
It’s worth noting that when the IMO (MARPOL Annex VI) capped today’s level of allowed sulphur content in marine fuels at 4.5% in 2005, the impact on bunker fuel availability was limited as few cases of heavy fuel oil (HFO) exceeded this sulphur cap. Gibson also mentioned that “following political pressure to further reduce sulphur emissions from shipping, a new set of sulphur requirements within MARPOL Annex VI are going to be implemented through the timetable outlined below. The next step will be introduced on 1st January 2012, when the global sulphur cap will be reduced to 3.5%. Whilst this may cause some tightness in availability at Fujairah and some Far East locations, it again appears manageable and likely to have only a limited impact” said Gibson.

Complete Post at:
http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/en-gb/News.aspx?ElementId=b66a39f4-3134-4185-b61d-6465f2a79501TopOfBlogs

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Review of Maritime Transport 2011 - UNCTAD

Posted - November 22, 2012 - UNCTAD

Highlights


More than 80 per cent of international trade in goods is carried by sea, and an even higher percentage of developing-country trade is carried in ships.
The Review of Maritime Transport, an annual publication prepared by the Division on Technology and Logistics of the UNCTAD secretariat, is an important source of information on this vital sector. It closely monitors developments affecting world seaborne trade, freight rates, ports, surface transport and logistics services, as well as trends in ship ownership and control and fleet age, tonnage supply and productivity.
The Review contains a chapter on legal and regulatory developments and each year includes a special chapter analyzing a selected topic in depth. In 2011, the focus is on the participation of developing countries in different maritime businesses.
Key developments reported in this year´s Review include the following:
  • After contracting in 2009, international shipping experienced an upswing in demand in 2010, and recorded a positive turnaround in volumes, especially in the dry bulk and container trade segments. Total seaborne trade reached an estimated 8.4 billion tons in 2010.
  • The year 2010 saw record deliveries of new tonnage, 28 per cent higher than in 2009, resulting in an 8.6 per cent growth in the world merchant fleet. The fleet reached almost 1.4 billion deadweight tons (dwt) in January 2011, an increase of 120 million dwt over 2010. New deliveries stood at 150 million dwt, against demolitions and other withdrawals from the market of approximately 30 million dwt.
  • The price of new-buildings was lower for all vessels types in 2010, reflecting market views that in the short term, the capacity of the world fleet is sufficient to meet world trade.
  • World container port throughput increased by an estimated 13.2 per cent to 517 million 20-foot equivalent units, or TEUs, in 2010, after stumbling briefly in 2009. The UNCTAD Liner Shipping Connectivity Index (LSCI) reveals that China maintains its lead as the single most connected country. It is followed by Hong Kong (China), Singapore and Germany. In 2011, 91 countries increased their LSCI ranking over 2010, 6 saw no change, and 65 recorded a decrease.
  • In 2010, the rail freight sector grew by 7.2 per cent to reach 9,843 billion freight ton kilometers (FTKs) The road freight sector grew by 7.8 per cent in 2010 over the previous year, with volumes reaching 9,721 billion FTKs.
Complete Post at:
http://unctad.org/Templates/webflyer.asp?docid=15876&intItemID=2068&lang=1TopOfBlogs

IMO piracy and emission focus - Maritime Journal

Posted November 22, 2011 - Maritime Journal

IMO secretary general, Efthimios E.Mitropoulos told delegates at the 27th IMO assembly this week that piracy and ships emissions have been central themes of the organisation’s work this year.
In his opening address to the assembly, Mr Mitropoulos, said that the escalation of piracy had prompted IMO to make combating it an important issue this year.
An action plan devised in collaboration with the shipping industry and seafarer organizations is being implemented. Although the number of successful pirate attacks has dropped to less than 20% this year, as of last week 15 ships were still being held in Somalia – an indication that the situation is still serious.
 
Complete Post at:
http://www.maritimejournal.com/news101/imo-piracy-and-emission-focusTopOfBlogs

Friday, November 18, 2011

Shipping prepares for climate change talks - Maritime Journal

 Posted - 17 Nov 2011 - Maritime Journal

The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), which represents all sectors and trades of the global shipping industry, has produced a briefing document for government climate change negotiators.
It appears in advance of the next United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 17), which commences in Durban at the end of this month. The document entitled ‘Shipping, World Trade and the Reduction of CO2 Emissions’ is being distributed via ICS member national shipowners’ associations and can be downloaded at: www.icsshipping.org/CO2lowres.pdf
ICS Secretary General Peter Hinchliffe said “The international shipping industry is firmly committed to reducing its CO2 emissions by twenty per cent by 2020, with significant further reductions thereafter. However, the Durban Climate Change Conference needs to give the International Maritime Organization a clear mandate to continue its vital work to help us deliver further emission reductions through the development of Market Based Measures.”
The shipping industry hopes that governments at COP 17 will respond positively to the significant IMO agreement, in July 2011, to adopt a package of technical measures to reduce shipping's CO2 emissions, which by 2030 should reduce ships’ emissions by 25 to 30% compared to ‘business as usual’. This is the first ever international agreement containing binding and mandatory measures to reduce CO2 emissions that has so far been agreed for an entire industrial sector.
Most importantly, and without prejudice to what governments might agree at UNFCCC, the shipping industry believes that IMO is now very well placed to continue the real progress it is making on Market Based Measures to help deliver further emissions reductions. This includes a possible shipping industry environmental compensation fund, with possible linkages to any ‘Green Fund’ agreed by UNFCCC. This could address the Kyoto Protocol principle of ‘Common But Differentiated Responsibility’ (CBDR) by directing the lion’s share of any funds raised from international shipping to environment related projects in developing countries, including climate change mitigation and adaptation.

 Posted at:
http://www.maritimejournal.com/news101/shipping-prepares-for-climate-change-talksTopOfBlogs

Marine CSR in focus - Cruse and Ferry (dot) net

 Posted - 17 November 2011 -Michele Witthaus - Cruse and Ferry (dot) net

 InterManager Secretary General, Captain Kuba Szymanski, has called for a new approach to corporate social responsibility (CSR) with seafarers at its center.

Speaking at the 2011 InterManager Annual General Meeting in Manila, Philippines this week, Szymanski said that crew concerns should be embraced when implementing a CSR programme. “I am all in favor of protecting wildlife and the environment but I want to make sure that it is achievable and manageable,” he said. “I am a great believer in empowering ships’ crew and Masters to make sensible and correct operational decisions onboard without fear of unfair criminalization.”
Calling on industry bodies to “educate, not regulate”, Szymanski promised that InterManager members would work to self-regulate in order to minimize the need for mandatory regulation.
InterManager members already sign up to a Code of Conduct and participate in discussions about industry-wide initiatives such as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and corporate social responsibility. Szymanski told the meeting: “In my opinion, CSR goes hand in hand with the KPI project.”

Post at:
http://www.cruiseandferry.net/article/News/0088/Marine%20CSR%20in%20focusTopOfBlogs

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Norden calls for more realistic emissions regulations - IFW

Posted - Wed, 16 Nov 2011 - IFW

Norden president and CEO urges innovations to reduce emissions
Norden president and chief executive Carsten Mortensen has added to the argument for more realistic and practical emissions regulations, stating that as it becomes increasingly difficult for owners to juggle the challenges of meeting environmental expectations there are key issues that need to be addressed.

The major Danish shipowner, which operated an active fleet of 216 vessels during the third quarter and managed to post a $58m net profit for the first nine months of the year, will be directly affected by both CO2, SOx and NOx emissions regulations being implemented by the International Maritime Organization.
“I think one should continue to find innovations that can reduce emissions but one should be realistic,” Mortensen said.
This was particularly true of SOx and NOx particulate matter regulations, as it was “becoming more and more challenging to be a shipowner now that you have to have more and more grades of different fuels on board your ships”.
Like many others, he has major concerns over the implementation of sulphur emissions control areas, where ships can at present only burn fuel with 1% sulphur content, a level which is set to reduce to 0.1% in 2015.
Although his company conducted little business in the Baltic Sea — an example of one SECA — it would affect Norden’s operations in northern Europe. 
 
Complete Post at:
http://www.ifw-net.com/freightpubs/ifw/index/norden-calls-for-more-realistic-emissions-regulations/20017918987.htmTopOfBlogs

Global shipping emissions falling 13% - MB.com.ph

Posted - November 16, 2011 -By MICHELLE WIESE BOCKMANN (Bloomberg) - MB.com.ph

MANILA, Philippines — The global shipping fleet will cut fuel use to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by an average 13 percent in 2020, saving around $50 billion in costs, according to an International Maritime Organization study.
New energy-efficiency rules for ships, to come into effect in January 2013, were passed by the United Nation’s shipping agency in July. They aim to lower emission by as much as 20 percent for new ships by 2020 and 30 percent five years later. Existing ships need to have plans showing how they will cut fuel use with no targets set.
The rules will lower carbon emissions from shipping by 152 million metric tons to 951 million tons by 2020, a study commissioned by the IMO to assess the impact of regulations found. Energy-efficient designs for new ships, as well as sailing at lower speeds or making technical upgrades to existing vessels would curb emissions, according to the study.
Shipping won’t be able to reduce emissions below levels measured in 2010 over time because growth in world trade outweighs the cuts expected to be achieved, the study found.
International shipping accounted for 870 million tons or 2.7 percent of global output in 2007 and is the most efficient form of mass transport, according to a 2009 IMO study.
Curbs will apply to bulk carriers that haul minerals and grains, crude and product tankers, container ships that transport manufactured goods in boxes, refrigerated and general cargo ships, gas carriers, and combination carriers.

http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/341503/global-shipping-emissions-falling-13TopOfBlogs

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Study Shows Significant Reductions in CO2 Emissions from Ships from IMO Measures - Maritime Executive

Posted November 15, 2011 - Maritime Executive

An IMO-commissioned study into the impact of mandatory energy efficiency measures for international shipping shows that implementation of the measures will lead to significant reductions of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from ships, specifically reductions of carbon dioxide (CO2), resulting from enhanced fuel efficiency.
The study found that, by 2020, an average of 151.5 million tonnes of annual CO2 reductions are estimated from the introduction of the measures, a figure that by 2030, will increase to an average of 330 million tonnes annually. CO2 reduction measures will result in a significant reduction in fuel consumption, leading to a significant saving in fuel costs to the shipping industry
The study, Assessment of IMO mandated energy efficiency measures for international shipping*, was launched on Monday (14 November) ahead of the forthcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, to be held in Durban, South Africa, from 28 November to 9 December, 2011. 
IMO will report to that Conference on the breakthrough adoption, in July 2011 at IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), of mandatory technical and operational measures to reduce GHG emissions from international shipping. Amendments to the International Convention
on the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), Annex VI Regulations for the prevention of air pollution from ships, add a new chapter on Regulations on energy efficiency for ships. The regulations will apply to all ships of 400 gross tonnage and above and are expected to enter into force on 1 January 2013.

 Complete Story at:
http://www.maritime-executive.com/article/study-shows-significant-reductions-in-co2-emissions-from-ships-from-imo-measuresTopOfBlogs

IMO: Shipping deal will cut emissions by a quarter - Environmental Expert - Source - Business Green

Posted - November 15, 2011 -   Environmental Expert - Source - Business Green - Will Nichols

Emissions from shipping will fall by around 23 per cent over the next 20 years owing to a series of efficiency measures agreed earlier this year, according to the International Maritime Organization (IMO).
Shipping companies must consider operational practices, such as slower speeds, and technology upgrades in order to optimize the energy efficiency of their vessels under the mandatory regulations, while new vessels will have to meet rising minimum efficiency standards from 2015.

A report published by the UN body today predicts that these two measures will result in annual reductions in CO2 emissions of 151.5 million tonnes by 2020 and 330 million tonnes a decade later, equivalent to around 30 per cent of the 1,100 million tonnes the Committee on Climate Change estimates shipping produced in 2007.
Compared with the IMO's business-as-usual scenario, this is a reduction in fuel consumption and emissions of 13 per cent and 23 per cent by 2020 and 2030 respectively, slightly below the organization's estimate in July. By 2050, the figure is set to reach 39 per cent.
As a result, the industry is expected to save up to $310bn in annual fuel costs by 2030, although the IMO said that $200bn is a more likely figure.
Significant emissions from operational changes are likely to be realized before technical measures are introduced, the IMO says, with most of the initial savings resulting from sailing vessels at slower speeds
.
Complete Story at:
http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/2124527/imo-shipping-deal-cut-emissions-quarter?WT.rss_f=Home&WT.rss_a=IMO%3A+Shipping+deal+will+cut+emissions+by+a+quarter

http://www.environmental-expert.com/news/imo-shipping-deal-will-cut-emissions-by-a-quarter-266865TopOfBlogs

UN-mandated measures to significantly reduce carbon emissions from shipping - UN News Center

Posted - November 14, 2011 - UN News Center

The implementation of United Nations-mandated energy-efficiency measures will lead to a significant reduction in carbon emissions from ships and an increase in savings in fuel costs to the shipping industry, according to a study released today by the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO).
The study found that by 2020 an average of 151.5 million tons of carbon dioxide will be reduced every year, and this figure will increase to 330 million tons by 2030.
The measures to enhance fuel efficiency were introduced in July and entail technical as well as operational aspects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping.
The regulations require new ships to be designed to be more energy efficient by making it mandatory to adopt the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI). The measures are non-prescriptive as ship designers and builders are free to use whatever solution they want for each particular ship as long as the required energy-efficiency level is attained.
The new measures also require ships to implement a plan which sets out how energy savings can be made for each ship. Each package will differ depending on the type of ship, cargo and route, among other factors.
The regulations will apply to all ships of 400 gross tonnage and above, and are expected to enter into force on 1 January 2013. This is the first time that energy-efficiency measures are mandated for the international transport sector.

Complete Post at:
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=40392&Cr=shipping&Cr1=TopOfBlogs

Friday, November 11, 2011

SOX knocks boxes onto roads - Maritime Journal

Posted November 10, 2011 - Maritime Journal


The 2015 sulphur Emission Control Area (ECA) regulations may increase bunker fuel costs by 87%, forcing as much as half of the present freight that transits through these areas onto the roads.


Sulphur regulations could cost £3.6bn a year to shipping within 200 miles of the UK.
In a submission to the British Government’s Transport Select Committee last month, Maritime UK warned of the potential side effects of plans proposed by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and the EU to reduce the levels of sulphur fuel, saying, “These regulations will create considerable financial, logistical, societal and even environmental impacts.”
The body highlighted some of the likely major consequences of applying the 0.1% low sulphur fuel regulation. These include an average activity shift of 50% from sea to land in Emission Control Areas, increasing congestion and road pollution, raising fuel prices and undermining current efforts to reduce road freight by promoting short sea shipping.
Also predicted are an additional 12m tons of carbon emissions in Europe alone through hydro-treating heavy fuel oil to meet requirements. The body is also concerned about an increase in people using less environmentally friendly air travel as longer ferry routes close and cruise prices rise, all of which could lead to job losses in UK ports and across associated infrastructure.
Maritime UK requested an investigation into the effects of new legislation in Emission Control Areas (ECAs) in July and last month’s submission are in response to a call for evidence from the Transport Select Committee on the issue.
Current efforts by UK Shipping Minister Mike Penning to reduce road freight by promoting short sea shipping would clearly be undermined by these fuel plans. The submission also expresses concerns that the “net environmental benefits” of sulphur reduction will be lost under current proposals.
The body highlights that the industry does recognize the sulphur problem, stating, “Maritime UK fully acknowledges the need to reduce emissions of SOX from shipping for environmental and health reasons.”

Posted At:
http://www.maritimejournal.com/news101/sox-knocks-boxes-onto-roads


Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Whose shipping emission is it anyway? - Bunkerworld

Posted - 8th November 2011 13:30 GMT - Bunkerworld - Tristan Smith Research Associate

To some, the idea of allocating a portion of international shipping emissions to an individual nation is pedantic, to others it can even be vexatious – heralding unilateral action and disruption of an inescapably global system. However, the fact that shipping is a global system should not stop an individual or a country trying to estimate their own responsibility.
This is a key element of the CCC’s recent study on UK emissions, to try and quantify the problem so that it can anticipate the consequence of inclusion of shipping in its carbon budgets on the other sectors of the economy. Without this consideration, the UK’s climate change act would be disingenuous and any route map to fulfil the act’s objective at best inefficient and at worst ineffective.
So last week, when the CCC published their report, it was both a relief and a disappointment. They do advocate that international shipping is included in UK’s 2050 target and future budgets. But to calculate what this responsibility means, they have adopted two different methods in order to give lower and upper bounds estimates – a bottom-up model based on ship activity (11 Mt CO2 in 2006) and a top-down calculation based on tonnes of goods unloaded and corrected with a fudge factor (16 Mt CO2 in 2006). We could quibble about whether the numbers are right, but I’m more interested for now in whether the method is right.
 
 Complete post at:
http://www.bunkerworld.com/forum/blogs/64/107986/Tristan-Smith/Whose-shipping-emission-is-it-anyway

TopOfBlogs

UK Chamber of Shipping emphasizes need for a global solution to mitigate industry emissions - Maritime Information Services Ltd.

Posted - November 5, 2011 - Maritime Information Services Ltd.
  • UK Chamber of Shipping stresses need for a global solution in reducing industry emissions

  • Trade association also believes measures need IMO guidance

Industry bodies have been busy voicing a day after the UK’s Committee on Climate Change (CCC) recommended that shipping emissions be included in the country’s climate targets and climate budgets.
The UK Chamber of Shipping yesterday welcomed the Committee on Climate Change (CCC) review of UK shipping emissions, but stressed that reducing emissions from shipping would require global cooperation.
“This work is hugely important and complements ground breaking work that the UK Chamber has been doing in leading and shaping the debate on how shipping can drive down carbon emissions,” said David Balston, Director Safety & Environment at the UK Chamber of Shipping.
“We do stress, however, that any solution must be global rather than regional to avoid distorting world trade and potentially damaging an industry that is vital to the future prosperity of the United Kingdom”, he added.
Additionally, the UK shipping industry’s trade association said that the introduction of any such measures must be done globally through the International Maritime Organization rather than regional authorities.
The Chamber also agreed that shipping should not be excluded from future carbon targets, given that by 2050 shipping emissions in the UK could amount for up to 11 percent of the total emissions permitted under the Climate Change Act.

TopOfBlogsComplete Post at: http://www.porttechnology.org/news/uk_chamber_of_shipping_emphasizes_need_for_a_global_solution_to_mitigate_in/

Why Shipping Emissions Are Not Included In UK’s Carbon Objective 2050? - Marine Insight

Posted - November 5, 2011 - by

According to statistics put forth by the government of United Kingdom, the rate of carbon dioxide emissions by way of the maritime sector is about 11 million tonnes. However, there seems to be a huge difference in this figure the ones put forth by the CCC which stands between 12-14 million tonnes of carbon dioxide.
A further discrepancy in the statistics was observed from the figures released by the Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research, which stood between 31- 42 million tonnes of carbon dioxide. This difference in the statistical count is purported to be on account of the different methodologies utilised to calculate these emission rates.
The CCC has also further indicated that the above mentioned statistics could increase up to 18 million tonnes by the stipulated year (2050), accounting to about 11% of the nation’s emissions of noxious gases. These stark figures, according to the CEO of the CCC, David Kennedy are indicators that the marine sector is not a superficial area to be omitted from the nation’s emission reducing objectives.
Shipping CO2 emissions 300x170 Why Shipping Emissions Are Not Included In UK’s Carbon Objective 2050?
At present, the main reason why the maritime and the aviation sectors have been exempted from the 2050 objective is because of the distinct lack of uniformity in the calculation of emanations. While the government calculates the percentage of emissions on the basis of the sales figure of the vessels’ fuel requirements, the other statistical tabulators take into consideration several other factors like the vessels’ refueling at other European docks and harbors.
Given the catch in the situation, the CCC has come up with a recommendation of three choices. The first choice involves the complete inclusion of the maritime sector in the stipulated deadline along an inclusion in the already existing budgetary norms for carbon emanations.
The second choice proposes the inclusion of the marine sector in the 2050 deadline but its exclusion in the carbon budgetary norms till a uniform methodology of emission tabulation is achieved internationally. The final choice proposes the inclusion of the sector in the 2050 deadline along with a vague date of inclusion in the carbon budgetary norms.

The CCC CEO believes that the final choice involves a lot of legalities, allowing it to be treated as a priority to be addressed within the upcoming three months. If the issue of inclusion of the marine sector in the 2050 objective of the United Kingdom is settled with the industry being included in the deadline, it would result in the nation being the first to encompass the maritime industry within the realms of emission control to safeguard the environment.

Story at:
http://www.marineinsight.com/news/headline/why-shipping-emissions-are-not-included-in-uk%E2%80%99s-carbon-objective-2050/

TopOfBlogs

Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets - Left Foot Forward

 Posted - November 3, 2011 Left Foot Forward

Friends of the Earth today described the UK government’s omission of shipping emissions in its climate targets as “like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky”.
FoE were responding to the Committee on Climate Change’s Review of UK Shipping Emissions, published this morning, which warns the UK’s share of international shipping could account for up to 11 per cent of British emissions by 2050.
The CCC, like FoE, says shipping emissions should be included in the UK’s 2050 climate targets.
It sets out options for the inclusion of shipping in UK carbon budgets – a cap on the total quantity of greenhouse gas emissions that can be emitted over a five year period.
Under the Climate Change Act the UK has to cut its emissions by 80% (of 1990 levels) by 2050 – yet this target doesn’t include the UK’s share of emissions from international shipping or aviation.
Friends of the Earth’s transport campaigner Richard Dyer said:
“Leaving out the UK’s share of international shipping from our climate targets would be like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky. Ignoring the growing climate impact of shipping would be a titanic mistake which could sink our ability to develop a safe and prosperous future.
“The international community must also take urgent action to ensure the shipping industry plays its part in a low-carbon transport system.”

 Complete Post at:
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2011/11/pollution-from-ships-omitted-from-uk-government-climate-targets/

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Global Blue Carbon Market Proposed by Five UN Agencies - Environmental News Services

Posted October 31, 2011 Environmental News Services

PARIS, France, November 1, 2011 (ENS) - A global blue carbon market that would create direct economic gain for those who protect ocean habitats is the main feature of a plan issued today by five United Nations agencies to improve the management of the world's ocean and coastal areas.
The "Blueprint for Ocean and Coastal Sustainability" says that the agencies intend to work with existing international carbon markets to define and implement a blue carbon market for protecting marine and coastal carbon sinks.
Rainbow frames a salt marsh in the Wadden Sea, Germany. (Photo by Peter Femto)
Oceans act as sinks for the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide, CO2. In fact, the oceans are the largest active carbon sink on Earth, absorbing 26 percent of all CO2 emissions.
One reason for the oceans' big share of carbon is its biological pump, which removes carbon dioxide from the ocean surface, changing it into living matter and distributing it to the deeper water layers.
Out of all the biological carbon captured in the world, 55 percent is taken up at sea by marine living organisms, and so is called blue carbon.
At least half of this is captured by the ocean's vegetated habitats - mangroves, salt marshes, seagrasses, and seaweed. These plants cover less than 0.5 percent of the seabed, but play an important role in regulating the climate and mitigating climate change.
Marine plankton on the surface of Puget Sound, USA (Photo by Washington State Dept. of Ecology)
The five UN agencies that authored the Blueprint - UNESCO, the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, the United Nations Development Programme, the International Maritime Organization, and the UN Food and Agriculture Organization - warn that although the oceans account for 70 percent of the planet's surface, only one percent of that area is protected.
To develop and implement a global strategy on blue carbon, their Blueprint says standards must be agreed for blue carbon monitoring and certification. Targets must be set for habitat protection in the context of blue carbon.
In addition, economic valuation methodologies must be developed for blue forest ecosystem services.
The agencies say they will work to create global acceptance of ocean and coastal habitats as a new form of tradable carbon market with a "global blue carbon fund."
Within international climate change policy instruments, they intend to create mechanisms that will allow the future use of carbon credits for marine and coastal ecosystem carbon capture and storage.
The critical role of oceans and their ecosystems has been overlooked, the agencies say. They aim to ensure oceans and coastal ecosystems are not neglected at the upcoming Rio+20 conference scheduled for June 2012.
Mangrove forest on the coast of Yangjiang, Guangdong, China (Photo by Leo Zhu)
Their report emphasises that 60 percent of the world's major marine ecosystems have been degraded or are being used unsustainably, resulting in huge economic and social losses.
Mangrove forests have lost 30 to 50 percent of their original cover in the last 50 years while coral reefs have lost 20 percent, increasing the vulnerability of many highly populated coastal areas.
The ocean absorbs close to 26 percent of atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions. This is causing acidification of the oceans that is already threatening some varieties of plankton and poses a threat to the entire marine food chain and the human livelihoods that depend on the oceans and coastal waters.
"Some of these phenomena are not new but are aggravated by cumulative pressures such as climate change, intensified human activity and technological advances," the agencies said today.
Breaking wave at Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Atlantic Ocean (Photo by Marc Pinter)
"Ecosystems situated in the deep ocean, where biodiversity and habitats often have major value, but are generally not well understood, have virtually no protection at all."
The international community pledged to tackle these challenges at the United Nations summits in Rio in 1992 and Johannesburg (in 2002.
But the commitments made there remain ineffective and their objectives have not been met, the UN agencies acknowledge. Neither the pledge to restore fish stocks to sustainable levels by 2015, nor the promise to create networks of protected marine areas by 2012 have been met.
Few countries have adopted legislation to reduce land-based marine pollution,which has led to an increase in the number of dead ocean areas, the report finds. More than 400 marine areas have been listed as "biologically dead."
"The full implementation of many of these goals and targets will require further efforts by states, intergovernmental organizations and the international community," write the authors.
They claim the present situation is the result of insufficient political will and resources, inadequate institutional capacities, insufficient scientific data and market imbalances.
"Greening the Blue Economy will be science and technology driven," they conclude. "But success will depend on sound policy processes and effective institutional arrangements and will therefore require commitment and funding from the international community as well as nations and industry."

 Posted at:
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/nov2011/2011-11-01-01.html