ShareThis

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

LNG fighting for legitimacy - WorkBoat.com

Posted - April 30, 2013 -  Ken Hocke - WorkBoat.com


The Space Shuttle’s days are over, so the need to produce those big orange fuel tanks that became synonymous with shuttle launchings for 30 years is also over. For years NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans produced those big orange tanks.
In March, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and Lockheed Martin IS &GS-Defense President Gerry Fasano announced that Lockheed would make a $3 million capital investment at the Michoud facility to manufacture cryogenic tanks for liquefied natural gas.
The LNG tanks, which initially will be used for ship propulsion, are part of Lockheed Martin's increased emphasis on converting defense technology to commercial applications, the company said. Lockheed said the project will create 166 new direct jobs with an average salary of $42,000 a year, plus benefits.
Meanwhile, TY Offshore in Gulfport, La., is building multiple 302'x64' OSVs for Harvey Gulf International Marine that will carry duel-fuel propulsion systems of diesel and LNG. LNG is a cleaner burning fuel than diesel.
During a visit last week at TY Offshore with WorkBoat Technical Editor Bruce Buls, TY vice presidents William S. Smith III and Jim Rivers were both bullish on LNG use as a fuel for marine vessels going forward.
“I think it will progress beyond duel fuel to LNG only,” said Smith. “DNV (Det NorskeVeritas) is saying 50 percent of the (maritime) fleet will be duel fuel by 2020.”
Yet many in the industry who are not convinced. Lack of infrastructure and the danger of explosions are two of the biggest barriers to its acceptance.
“Nobody wants them to build any more LNG terminals in their towns or cities because it’s too dangerous,” said Andre Dubroc, general manager at Master Boat Builders, Bayou La Batre, Ala. “That’s a problem.”
Will LNG become the marine fuel of the future?
We'll see.

http://www.workboat.com/Blogs/The-Hocke-Net/LNG-fighting-for-legitimacy/?utm_source=NewsLinks&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=InformzNews
TopOfBlogs

ABS Releases Exhaust Gas Scrubber Advisory - Maritime Executive

Posted - April 30, 2013 -  Maritime Executive

Adds to guidance available to help industry meet environmental requirements

ABS, a leading provider of maritime classification services, announces the release of the ABS Advisory on Exhaust Gas Scrubber Systems, which will aid vessel owners and operators in assessing the viability of utilizing exhaust scrubbers to meet current and forthcoming environmental requirements.

As the industry seeks solutions for increasingly stringent low sulfur fuel requirements, owners and operators should fully understand the impact of the regulations and properly assess available technologies. Fuel switching, which is frequently utilized in Emission Control Areas today is not expected to be a viable option in the future. Exhaust gas scrubber systems, use of higher priced low sulfur fuels and alternative fuels are among the options available to address emission requirements, but challenges remain in identifying the most suitable technology.

"Owners and operators mindful of stringent low sulfur fuel oil requirements are seeking cost-effective solutions that best meet their expected operating profile," says ABS Vice President for Operational and Environmental Performance Howard Fireman. "This Advisory highlights the relevant regulatory and technical considerations that should be taken into account when making decisions on how to comply with emissions requirements."

When considering technology and practices to meet emissions regulations, ABS' Operational and Environmental Performance team can be relied on to clarify the requirements and explain the available technologies, including potential safety concerns. The team helps owners and operators determine the appropriate course of action for their unique circumstances. 

"The first step towards compliance is to develop a thorough understanding of regulations and then review available technologies. The Advisory has been developed specifically for that process," says Fireman.  "Once the options are identified, owners and operators must find the most cost-effective solution that fits within their expected operating profile and ABS is here to assist with such techno-economic analysis."

In addition to the Advisory on Exhaust Gas Scrubber Systems, ABS has previously published the Fuel Switching Advisory Notice and the Guide for Propulsion and Auxiliary Systems for Gas Fueled Ships that can help assess and develop solutions to meet emissions requirements.


Post to be found at:
http://www.maritime-executive.com/article/ABS-Releases-Exhaust-Gas-Scrubber-Advisory-2013-04-30/
TopOfBlogs

Infographic on the switch to LNG from Diesel

From a message I received - passing on an information source without comment.

  • Subject: DNV, Encana, Shell and others all looking at LNG for Marine
Hi

With the increased regulatory pressure being imposed by the emissions control areas around the USA, the switch to LNG from Diesel is looking increasingly like a commercial necessity. But challenges in understanding market development are still common across both the Marine and Gas sectors.
So FC Business Intelligence has put together an infographic to give you a digestible, easy to read view on the market as it is and how it’s going to progress.

To download your free infographic, click here:
http://bit.ly/11CqB6P

The infographic includes:

• Gas price scenarios and the knock on effect for the marine market
• An examination of the fuels costs involved with ships, the return on investment if you convert your ship and a look at how LNG can make a big difference to fuel costs
• A pictographic representation of the factors that will effect market development

I hope you find this useful as you take a further interest in the biggest change to hit the marine market for decades.

Best regards

Oliver

Oliver Saunders
FC Business Intelligence
7-9 Fashion Street
London
E1 6PX
T: +44 (0) 207 375 7185
M: +44 (0) 7969 032720
TopOfBlogs

Fracking could be the new future for some ports - Maritime Professional

Posted - April 30, 2013 - Martin Rushmere - Maritime Professional

This is not an endorsement of  hydraulic fracturing (fracking) as I have very grave concerns for the environment as it relates to this process of mining Hydro - Carbons.

Northwest and as the door on a coal terminal closes, another opens for hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Gray’s Harbor, normally associated with autos and breakbulk, is eyeing a huge bonanza in the form of crude-by-rail.
The stuff will probably come from the North Dakota fields, although other sources are being looked at. Three companies are keenly interested -- Westway Terminal Company: Imperium Terminal Services and Grays Harbor Rail Terminal (a subsidiary of US Development).
US Development is in a real hurry to get going and has reduced its original plan for two unit trains per day to one, every other day, which would bring in about 50,000 bbl a day facility. The company estimates an investment of $60 million and reckons the site could be operational in the first quarter of 2015.
The port is setting aside Terminals 1 and 3 for the three projects and says there will be 100-150 vessel calls a year if all operate at capacity. The Terminal 3 berth depth is between 38 and 40 feet, and needs yearly maintenance. The length is more than 500 feet. Terminal 1 berth depth of is 41 feet, and has a length of 480 feet.
Not so fast, says an eco-group called Citizens for a Clean Harbor. The group says “the import and export of crude oil in this extremely fragile and vital estuary would be catastrophic. There are three crude oil terminals proposed bringing in over 97 million gallons of crude.
“Billions of dollars come into the local economy through fishing, crabbing, shellfish growing, a migratory bird refuge of hemispheric importance, and many other jobs which would be destroyed with one spill,” says the group. “In addition, the rail lines are in disrepair and the additional rail traffic from the mile-long trains would negatively impact many communities and businesses.”
In 2012 a proposal to build a coal export terminal was dropped, partly because of pressure from environmental groups. The developer, RailAmerica, said a third party was interested in the site and had bought in.
Oil may be less of an environmental hazard than coal, but one thing’s for sure and that’s the optimism being shown by US Development. In all likelihood the terminal will only be operational in 2016 at the earliest.

Post to be found at:
http://www.maritimeprofessional.com/Blogs/Martin-Rushmere/April-2013/Fracking-could-be-the-new-future-for-some-ports-%282.aspx
TopOfBlogs

A Need For Compliance Body To Focus On Industry - maritimeprofessional.com

Posted - Apr 29, 2013, 2:47PM EST - By Joseph Fonseca - Maritime Professional

Multiplicity of governing authorities, lack of integration and scarcity of proper response mechanism pose a threat to handling and transportation of hazardous cargo.

Mishandling and improper stowage of hazardous material have been the cause of horrendous incidents, some of which are very difficult to forget. India has had more than its share of such accidents. The most towering one being the Bhopal gas tragedy in which methyl isocyanate gas and other chemicals leaked out from the plant of Union Carbide India Ltd (UCIL)  on the night of 3rd December 1984 leaving around 8,000 dead and over 500,000 people in Bhopal city injured or maimed for life.  
It was in June 2010, seven ex-employees, including the former chairman of UCIL, were convicted for causing death by negligence and sentenced to two years imprisonment and a fine of about $2,000 each, the maximum punishment allowed by law. The situation in India for such tragedies happening again now is no different from what existed then and the culprits can still get away with light sentences.  
The International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code has not yet been ratified by India. What is worse is that there are multiple regulators when it comes to transportation of hazardous cargo. The Director General of Shipping, the Indian administration is responsible only for shipping within the Indian territorial waters. There is no common law or regulator for the inland transport by road or rail, or for ports, etc. Major ports (which come under the federal governments) and minor ports (under the jurisdiction of the state governments) operate under different laws.
In this gloomy, obscure and manipulative environment Capt Vivek Bhandarkar, CEO of Bhandarkar Events, has taken upon himself the crusader’s role of creating awareness and at the same time offering guidance on the full range of regulatory compliance support options to personnel who play the crucial role in handling hazardous cargo in the shipping, ports, freight forwarding, multimodal and transport operators, etc. He has been conducting regular conferences, seminars and training courses on handling and transportation of hazardous materials since 2004, when he started off with his first program in Mumbai. He has been travelling the length and breadth of the country doing his best in cultivating conscientious observance of preventive measures and proper handling of hazardous cargo.
In his seminars like the one of 26th and 27th April, 2013 he brings to focus various problems created because there is no single authority as in the US where there is the Department of Transport which is the regulatory authority for all modes of transport. Stated R. Rajasekhar, Vice President (Commercial) United Phosphorus Ltd., “Internationally the single authority system tells you what you are expected to do when you undertake different functions, but in India this is lacking as there are multiple governing authorities.”
Capt Deepak Kapoor, Deputy Nautical Advisor to the Government of India and Deputy General of Shipping agreed about the confusion that exists. He said, “Yes, because of the multiplicity of governing authorities the integration is lacking and hence the desired information is not known to the user. As for shipping we have the ISM code which requires a specific plan. The major ports have the Dock Safety, Health & Welfare Act which prescribes the safety norms but not applicable to minor ports.”       
Speaking about the importance of various operating agencies Haresh Lalwani of Sun Logistics informed about the lurking dangers in belittling precautionary measures which actually compromises safety. There is the inclination to cut corners, avoid precautionary measures considered unnecessary in order to cut down costs, or to avoid lengthy procedures. “This is foolish as it can be dangerous to everyone in the transportation chain,” he says. He underscores the importance of complying with various regulations as it benefits all.   
In-depth information on the classification, guidelines and responsibilities under the International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code was lucidly explained by Shashi Kallada, a specialist on handling hazardous cargo in India. Various other aspects presented included packaging, preparedness of Indian ports for HNS emergencies, carriage of hazardous and noxious substances by sea, importance of labeling, marking, storage and other related topics.
It was pointed out that the port authorities now have a proper response mechanism in place. There are nodal agencies which are monitoring the response mechanism. The Directorate General of Shipping has asked the port authorities to maintain a fleet of tugs ready at hand when such vessels with hazardous cargo are allowed to berth. The terminals in ports have also been advised to put in place adequate response mechanism to deal with any contingencies occurring from such ships.

Post to  be found at:
http://www.maritimeprofessional.com/Blogs/Lurking-hazards-in-transporting-dangerous-goods/April-2013/Lurking-hazards-in-transporting-dangerous-goods.aspx
TopOfBlogs

Monday, April 29, 2013

Commission calls for cooperation to boost sustainable aquaculture in Europe - European Commission Press release

Posted - April 29, 2013 -  European Commission  Press release - Reference: IP/13/381 

Commission calls for cooperation to boost sustainable aquaculture in Europe
To boost the development of EU aquaculture, the European Commission has issued strategic guidelines, thereby cooperating with Member States and stakeholders in overcoming the challenges facing the sector. The EU aquaculture sector has a significant growth potential and can help to spare overexploited sea resources. The Guidelines presented today will help coordinate efforts across all Member States. They do not create new legal obligations, but present a series of voluntary steps that Member States, the Commission, and stakeholders can take to promote an industry that is economically, socially and environmentally sustainable and provides consumers with healthy, high-quality seafood.
As outlined in the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy – currently under negotiation - the aquaculture industry can help fill the gap between an ever growing consumption of seafood and dwindling fish stocks. In fact, it can provide a viable alternative to overfishing and generate growth and jobs in both coastal and inland areas. In other parts of the world the industry is booming. Globally, in the EU it is stagnating, partly because of slow licensing procedures and administrative inefficiencies at different levels.
Today, obtaining a licence for a new farm can take up to three years, which obviously deters investors” said European Commissioner for Maritime Affaires and Fisheries Maria Damanaki. "I want to work with Member States to cut red tape and help the competitiveness of this sector building upon the high level of consumer and environmental protection we currently have".
The Commission, in close consultation with all stakeholders, has identified four main challenges facing the aquaculture sector: a necessity to reduce red tape and uncertainties for operators; a need to facilitate access to space and water; a requirement to increase the sector's competitiveness; and a need to improve the level playing field by exploiting the competitive edge of "made-in-the-EU" fish products.
The guidelines address these challenges and identify a mix of measures like administrative simplification, spatial planning, market organisation, diversification, better labelling and information, to help market forces unlock the potential of the EU aquaculture sector. For example:
  • the Commission will coordinate an exercise in identifying best practices to reduce licensing times to start new aquaculture businesses
  • the Commission is promoting an integrated approach to spatial planning that will help guaranteeing fish farmers proper access to space and water while minimizing impact on the environment and on other economic activities.
  • European aquaculture offers top-quality products which comply with the highest standards for consumer health, environment protection and animal welfare. This carries cost implications for producers, but proper information on the products' quality, such as labelling, can turn it into a competitive advantage and improve consumers' perception.
Next step
The strategic guidelines are linked to the proposed reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) which aims to promote aquaculture through a so-called 'open method of coordination'. On the basis of these guidelines, and without prejudice to the outcome of the negotiations on the CFP reform, Member States will prepare their Multiannual national strategic plans, taking into consideration each country's specific starting conditions, challenges and potential. The Commission will help coordinating activities and exchanging best practices and in providing further guidance on how to reconcile, in practice, economic activities with EU legislation.
Background
In 2010, the value of EU aquaculture production was € 3.1 billion for 1.26 million tons of production. This corresponds to about 2% of global aquaculture production. EU aquaculture production has stagnated in the last decade, while other areas – in particular Asia – have seen a very fast growth of the sector.
Today, 10% of the EU seafood consumption comes from aquaculture, 25% from EU fisheries and 65% from imports from third countries (including both fisheries and aquaculture); the gap between consumption and production of our capture fisheries has been steadily growing in the last years, and aquaculture can help filling it. Each percentage point of current EU consumption produced internally through aquaculture could help create between 3,000 and 4,000 full-time jobs.
More information
MEMO/13/391

Post and information to be found at:
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-381_en.htm?locale=en
TopOfBlogs

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Onboard carbon capture: dream or reality? - Electric Power & Light

Posted - April 28, 2013 - Electric Power & Light

As the world continues to face up to the effects of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, the global shipping industry has been turning its attention to its own contribution to the problem. And a sizeable contribution it is too, with today's maritime CO2 emissions of around a billion tonnes a year accounting for three percent of the global emissions total. Emissions from marine transport are also predicted to rise to between two and three billion tonnes by 2050.
With shipping volumes expanding in step with growing global trade demand, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) responded to the emissions challenge in July 2011 with the creation of the world's first mandatory, global greenhouse gas reduction scheme for an entire industry sector.
The expanded MARPOL Annex VI is a sure sign that the winds are changing for marine carbon emissions, with national and international bodies such as the European Union starting to tighten their own emissions limits. The industry's focus on emissions reduction, on top of rising fuel costs, is spurring a new wave of carbon-efficient marine propulsion technologies and initiatives, including a steady shift away from heavy fuel oil and towards more efficient liquefied natural gas (LNG).
While today's maritime efficiency drives predominantly centre on incremental improvements that are feasible with present-day technologies and financial constraints, a few projects are looking to the future with more radical ideas that could shape eco-friendly shipping in decades to come.
One such project was recently completed by Norway's innovative classification society and risk management specialist Det Norske Veritas (DNV). The conceptual project, which was carried out in collaboration with UK modelling software company Process Systems Enterprise (PSE) and led by DNV's head of research and innovation for Greece, Dr. Nikolaos Kakalis, aimed to gauge the theoretical feasibility of implementing carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology onboard large vessels.
Carbon capture and storage is a complex, emerging process currently being put through its paces at various pilot power plants around the world. In its originally intended form, the basic CCS process involves the separation of CO2 from a fossil fuel power station's post-combustion flue gas, removing its emission from the power generation cycle and transmitting it for storage or industrial use.
Given that CCS is still a relatively unproven concept, even in the large onshore power plants it was designed for, the idea of transplanting this complex system to the constantly moving, space-constrained confines of a vessel seems ambitious in the extreme. In essence, DNV's project was searching for a way to take the land-based CCS process and adapt it to separate the CO2 from a vessel's main engine exhaust and store it for offloading at a port.
The advanced and hugely expensive implications of maritime CCS meant that DNV's feasibility project was always going to be a theoretical exercise, involving modelling the hypothetical design and operation of a ship-based CCS concept, rather than attempting to develop a physical prototype. Even so, Dr Kakalis notes that when DNV and PSE originally applied for funding from the European Commission for the project, the reaction was emphatic. "We got [funding] without any negotiation because the actual concept is very radical and innovative," he says.
DNV's research team was aware of the major challenges of the project from the outset. The project was simplified somewhat by taking an existing onshore carbon capture unit design and adapting it for maritime use, as well as the choice of a very large crude carrier (VLCC) as the hypothetical host, because of its size and relative abundance of deck space. Nevertheless, a number of conceptual challenges were unavoidable, as Kakalis explains.
"The big challenges are that you have a limited amount of space, a limited availability of resources, and of course the constant movement of the vessel," he says. "All these together create a very strong requirement for extra safety and risk management. That's where DNV comes into the game, because we are an expert when it comes to safety and risk management in shipping."
Fortunately, safety concerns about the storage of liquefied CO2 on a moving vessel turned out to be covered by DNV's existing rules and standards for gas carriers. Actually fitting the CCS system - mainly composed of two towers for CO2 separation and liquefaction, as well as cryogenic tanks for storage - onto a standard VLCC design represented the project's primary design task.
"What we managed to do was get a standard design of a chemical absorption carbon capture unit and scale it down, not only to fit into the constrained space but also to adapt it to the smaller amounts of CO2 that are emitted in comparison to a power plant onshore," says Kakalis. "The first question was where to place the carbon capture unit - the absorption unit and the regeneration column. In this particular concept, we placed them aft of the funnel, so behind the accommodation space of the vessel, on a raised deck. This, according to our calculations, is a good option as there is no obstruction to the rest of the machinery space or any other equipment or facilities.
"The other question is where do you store the liquefied CO2? We used a couple of cryogenic tanks that are placed on the deck. This is a concept that DNV has used before in another vessel concept called DNV Triality, which is similar to CO2 but for LNG tanks. So placing the CO2 tanks on the deck and not having them inside the actual hull means that you don't compromise the carrying capacity of the vessel. You don't lose cargo space."
So DNV's finalised concept, published in February 2013, did manage to prove the fundamental viability of maritime CCS, at least on paper. Indeed, the researchers' analysis of the system's potential benefits yielded some impressive results - onboard CCS would reportedly be capable of reducing ship CO2 emissions by up to 65%, which for a VLCC would be the equivalent of taking more than 70,000 tonnes of CO2 out of the atmosphere every year.
Perhaps the most exciting advantage of the CCS concept is what could be done with the CO2 after it is successfully separated and stored. Given the expanding industrial uses for CO2, ship operators would be able to transform their waste exhaust into a commodity to tap into profitable new sectors. For example, liquid CO2 could be transmitted to the oil and gas industry, where it is used as an injected medium in enhanced oil recovery operations for ageing fields.
The option that offers the neatest environmental symmetry would be to sell the CO2 to the increasingly large-scale producers of eco-friendly, algae-based biofuels, the production of which uses CO2 as a catalyst. So the harmful exhaust from vessels could theoretically be recycled as a component in the development of green fuel for ships or other vehicles.
"I think this is the most innovative part of this project, and the whole idea," says Kakalis. "The fact that you emit less, so you limit your harm to the environment, and at the same time, you can transform these harmful emissions into something that is useful and that can be traded, can become a commodity."
But for all the system's benefits, and however theoretically possible it might be, DNV's CCS concept is still confined to the drawing board. Bringing carbon capture into the real world requires the jumping of a major obstacle - the huge upfront investment that would be required to develop a prototype, and the uncertainty that reliable markets exist to buy the CO2 by-product and offset that investment.
"It all comes down to the investment," Kakalis says. "Someone will need to go through the building of a prototype unit, find out more about the real cost and then see what could be a break-even selling price for the CO2. From what we know of onshore CCS, it costs a lot. This concept will require something like a more integrated value chain, so that somebody could present some contracts selling this CO2 to the oil and gas industries or to big companies that are producing algae-based biofuel. So someone really needs to have forward contracts to make this a reality."
Against the backdrop of a shipping industry that is still suffering the effects of the global downturn and soaring fuel prices, cautious shipowners clearly need time to catch up with an idea as radical as onboard CCS.
But DNV's project sets a solid foundation for the further development of the concept in the future. And as Kakalis notes, the very existence of a potentially revolutionary concept such as this does engender a little optimism for the future, both financial and environmental. "We are in difficult times for shipping, mainly due to the very high fuel prices and the pressure of [environmental] regulations. It's good to see that technology could bring some answers to the table."
Despite biofuels promising to be more environmentally-friendly, critics have condemned their efficiency, labelling the technology too immature to be relied upon.
The need for operationally-dependable and financially-efficient ships has led to rapid innovation in marine propulsion during recent years.

Copyright 2013 Progressive Media Group Limited
All Rights ReservedWire News provided by

Post to be found at:
http://www.elp.com/news/2013/04/26/onboard-carbon-capture-dream-or-reality.html
TopOfBlogs

Friday, April 26, 2013

Vested interests driving waste project - South China Morning Post

Posted - April, 26, 2013 -  Martin Williams, director, Hong Kong Outdoors - South China Morning Post

There were quick responses to R. E. J. Bunker's letter on marine accidents, which he believes would become more likely with barge traffic to and from the planned Shek Kwu Chau waste incinerator ("Incinerator will raise risk of collisions", April 11).

scmpost_19mar11_ns_waste_20928273.jpg
Artist's Impression of the Shek Kwu Chau Incinerator. Photo: SCMP

Elvis Au, an assistant director of the Environmental Protection Department ("Traffic generated by waste management facility will be light, April 17) assured readers that marine transportation will continue to comply with safety measures.
He blithely ignores the fact that even with these measures, there have been recent accidents, including the collision between a Cheung Chau passenger ferry and a barge.
But then, in his role as front man for the mega incinerator project, Mr Au is adept at ignoring information that suggests it will be anything but glorious.
At a public meeting last December, I remarked that incineration results in emissions of poisonous chemicals and toxic ash.
Mr Au responded that my information was 40 years out of date - suggesting he was badly misinformed, as there are a host of reports and studies on recent health issues with incinerators, including in Macau.
Mr Au also boasted that he is an engineer, and would not do anything to harm people's health, which to me is like a doctor promising that a bridge will not collapse.
Along with colleagues, Mr Au has been dismissive of alternatives such as zero-waste strategies and plasma arc technology.
The reasons for such obduracy are hard to fathom.
In the course of two years opposing the mega incinerator, I have noticed that the only strong support comes from people and businesses that are involved in the project, or are set to benefit from the HK$23 billion that will be spent on the incinerator island and the associated work on extending the life of landfills.
Oliver Lam, of Lam Tin - well removed from Shek Kwu Chau - wrote of our need for advanced incinerators, which "can hardly cause any damage to people" ("Why we now need modern incinerators", April 16).
In Mr Lam's view, the Shek Kwu Chau site was proposed after a "prudent, detailed investigation conducted by professionals". Yet, in reality, the original preferred site was near Tuen Mun, until politics intervened.
Solutions to the waste problem are indeed required. But these should be based on science and common sense, not driven by politics and vested interests.

Post to be found at:
http://www.scmp.com/comment/letters/article/1223218/vested-interests-driving-waste-project
TopOfBlogs

Sea mineral firm launches £500,000 study on impact of mining seabed tin - This is Cornwall, The Cornishman West Briton

Posted - April, 26, 2013 - By Andy Greenwood - The West Morning News - This is Cornwall, The Cornishman West Briton

A company looking to extract millions of pounds worth of tin from the seabed off the Cornish coast has announced it is to invest £500,000 in a year-long environmental study.
Marine Minerals Limited has identified tin deposits washed out from historic mines on the coast between St Ives and Perranporth.
It is investigating whether recovering the metal is commercially viable and in February carried out seabed survey work.
The firm has now announced that it has started detailed research work. The results will contribute to a required Environmental Impact Assessment to accompany its license application, which is expected next year.
Marine Minerals director and commercial manager John Sewell said: "Our aim is to create a project which recovers the very valuable tin, while making as small an impact as possible.
"We need to understand in detail these issues – and the findings of these studies now underway will help us design the best process.
"Our scientific researchers will be looking at possible impacts on leisure activities, on marine and coastal plants and animals, on the landscape and geology, as well as air and water.
"We have said from the beginning that this project can only proceed if the waste tin sitting on the seabed can be recovered in a way which is environmentally and socially practical – these detailed environmental studies are vital to ensure we can meet this ambition."
The project could bring much-needed jobs and investment to Cornwall. It has, however, provoked controversy with fears it could impact on surfing beaches and the wider tourism economy.
It has now emerged that Marine Minerals failed to seek permission from Cornwall Council for the work carried out two months ago.
PerranporthBeach

Perranporth: Sea mineral firm launches £500,000 study on impact of mining seabed tin

A spokesman for the council said: "Marine Minerals Limited originally contacted the Marine Management Organization (MMO) with regard to its proposal to carry out test sampling at St Ives Bay.
"Unfortunately the company was not then advised to apply to the council as the relevant authority for a license to carry out these works. Although this was a breach of the Coast Protection Act, the council has decided that a prosecution would not be appropriate in these circumstances."
Marine Minerals said it had been in discussions with the council for over a year "and at no point was the need for any additional license raised with us". The spokesman added: "If it is shown that we require an additional license to extract further samples, then of course we shall comply."

Post to be found at:
http://www.thisiscornwall.co.uk/Sea-mineral-firm-launches-500-000-study-impact/story-18812083-detail/story.html#axzz2RaqXx0Tj
TopOfBlogs

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

U.S. Supreme Court asked to hear EPA greenhouse gas challenge - Reuters.com

Posted -  Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:47pm EDT - By Valerie Volcovici - WASHINGTON - Reuters.com



(Reuters) - Top industry groups and a dozen states have asked the Supreme Court to review a lower court decision upholding the Obama administration's plan to limit greenhouse gas emissions generated by power plants and vehicles.
The parties, which had until Friday to submit petitions to the high court, are challenging a 2012 decision by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals that upheld rules issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The petitioners attacked the rules on various grounds, but all argued that the agency should not use the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon emissions.
"EPA's ill-founded regulations represent a sweeping expansion of its regulatory power under the Clean Air Act and would impose new requirements on potentially millions of stationary sources across the country," the American Chemistry Council (ACC) said on Thursday.
The ACC was joined by other industry associations including the American Petroleum Institute, the National Association of Home Builders and the National Association of Manufacturers.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which ruled in favor of the EPA last year, denied the group's request for a rehearing in December, prompting the ACC and other organizations to turn to the Supreme Court.
The petitioners said the EPA incorrectly used the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program of the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases from power plants. They said the program only applies to six other kinds of air pollutants.
Another association, the Energy-Intensive Manufacturers Working Group on Greenhouse Gas Regulation, also took issue with the EPA's use of the PSD to regulate greenhouse gases.
"(The) petitioner submits it is not possible to find a regulatory structure less compatible with the regulation of carbon," the group wrote, adding that applying the PSD to carbon would result in massive numbers of facilities being regulated.
One petition focused on a core aspect of the EPA's greenhouse gas rules - the scientific "endangerment finding" that underpins its entire greenhouse gas program.
Lawyers with the conservative Pacific Legal Foundation argued that the EPA failed to submit its "endangerment finding" for independent scientific review by the EPA's Science Advisory Board as required by the Clean Air Act.
Other groups that filed petitions include the Utility Air Regulatory Group, an association of electric utilities and electricity-generating companies; 12 states led by Texas; and the conservative Southeastern Legal Foundation, which represents Republican lawmakers Michele Bachmann and Joe Barton, among others. (Reporting By Valerie Volcovici; editing by Xavier Briand)


Post to be found at:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/20/usa-court-greenhousegas-idUSL2N0D62DW20130420
TopOfBlogs

Market conditions limits BP actions in Gulf of Mexico - UPI.com

Posted -  April 23, 2013 at 6:43 AM - UPI.com

LONDON, April 23 (UPI) -- It's too early to put the second phase of the Mad Dog field in the Gulf of Mexico to rest despite market concerns, British energy company BP said.
BP and project partners Chevron and BHP Billiton are reviewing plans for Mad Dog Phase 2 in the Gulf of Mexico. BP said it was wary to move ahead because of market conditions and industry inflation.
Mad Dog Phase 2 included the development of as many 60 wells that would lead to the production of 130,000 barrels of oil per day.
BP told energy reporting website Rigzone it was too early to declare the project dead, however.
"It is too early to speculate when the details of the final plan will be approved by BP and its co-owners," the company said.
BP, Halliburton and Transocean are defending themselves in court in a case that aims to figure out which party is to blame for the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
U.S. lawmakers last week proposed legislation that would open more areas near the maritime border with Mexico to energy explorers, however.
A U.S.-Mexico agreement signed last year called for a joint inspection team to ensure compliance with applicable safety and environmental laws in the maritime area.

Post to be found at:
http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Energy-Resources/2013/04/23/Market-conditions-limits-BP-actions-in-Gulf-of-Mexico/UPI-72271366713805/
TopOfBlogs

Natural Gas in Transport: Tomorrow's Fuel Today - AOL Energy

Posted - April 23, 2013 - By - AOL Energy


Last week I had the opportunity to attend and participate in LNG17, the largest global gas event of 2013. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is a rapidly growing part of the larger natural gas industry and is especially relevant today because of the increasing global demand for transportation fuels. At the conference, it was clear to me that LNG is a priority for not only Shell, but also the entire industry because of its potential to provide real economic and environmental benefits to the transportation industry in trucks, trains and ships.For around 50 years, LNG has been used as a source of energy for power generation in cities but new technology and increasing demand has inspired Shell to invest in LNG for transport. Resources around the world, especially in North America, are abundant but supply is growing far faster than demand. It is the industry's responsibility to build the infrastructure and develop innovative technology to utilize this energy source to its fullest potential.

One of the key benefits of LNG for transport is its impact on the environment. When compared to conventional diesel, LNG used in transport has the potential to reduce emissions. Shell LNG fuel adheres to stringent International Marine Organization (IMO) guidelines for lower local emissions in the Sulphur Emission Control areas and can help address a broader range of environmental compliance requirements, such as reducing particulate matter and reducing nitrogen oxides (NOx). The overall carbon emissions reduction possible with LNG fuel offers improved performance of trucks and helps companies comply with environmental legislation.

LNG as a transportation fuel also has the potential to provide significant fuel cost savings to commercial fleet owners. During the last decade, the price of diesel in the U.S. increased on average by 12 percent per year, placing economic burden on the companies that rely heavily on long haul trucking fleets. For these truck operators facing a challenging economic climate, using LNG rather than diesel can reduce fuel costs by almost a third. LNG-fueled engines also help reduce noise up to 50 percent, which can contribute to improved driver well-being and increased fleet utilization in noise restricted zones.

Because of the economic and environmental benefits, we are working to expand our North American LNG refueling network in the Great Lakes, Gulf Coast and Canadian Green Corridor. Additionally, we are partnering with TravelCenters of America to provide LNG for truck operators across the U.S. and working with select Shell Flying J stations to develop the LNG truck stops in Canada.

We are also working with partners to develop new equipment and vehicle technology that can operate on LNG. For example, Shell is working with Mack and Volvo to develop LNG as a fuel option for trucks. The collaboration is built to support wider adoption of LNG trucks and is part of our larger LNG for transport strategy.

In marine transport, LNG has also gained momentum in the last couple of years with several ports in Europe supplying LNG for maritime use. Shell recently launched a barge powered entirely on LNG on the Rhine River in Rotterdam. The Green Stream, which will travel along the Rhine through The Netherlands and Germany during the next few months, is a first for Shell and for the inland marine industry. We are investing heavily in LNG fuel in the marine industry because we believe demand will grow rapidly as strict regulatory emission guidelines or emission control areas (ECA) continue to be implemented in North America and Western Europe.

An abundant supply of natural gas makes LNG for transport an affordable and cost-competitive fuel that has significant opportunities for emission reductions. However, the industry needs to work together to utilize available natural gas supplies and develop LNG for transport for trucks, ships barges and trains.

LNG is a fuel of the future - and it's available now.

Post to be found at:
http://energy.aol.com/2013/04/23/natural-gas-in-transport-tomorrow-s-fuel-today/
TopOfBlogs

China to issue industrial standards for LNG-powered vessels - Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

Posted - Wednesday, 24 April 2013 | 16:30 - Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

Maritime authorities in China are expected to issue industrial standards for LNG-powered vessels in the second half of this year to promote the ‘Oil to LNG’ conversion programme and the LNG fueling market.
Currently there are nearly 200 vessels that have been converted to LNG power in China, however, the market hasn’t been fully commercialised due to a lack of relevant industrial standards. China Classification Society (CCS) and the Maritime Administration of China have issued some guidance documents in the past two years but none of them are on an operating level.
“The LNG market in China is still facing development constraints including lack of technology standards and infrastructure, it would still take quite a while for the market to gain stable growth,” said Liu Yijun, an LNG specialist at the China University of Petroleum.
Source: Sino Ship News

Post to be found at:
http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/News.aspx?ElementId=5c49d9f7-f5fc-4c40-a383-bd19c781866c&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily
TopOfBlogs

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Alfa Laval wins SEK 55 million marine environmental order from MAN - Wall Street Journal

Posted - April 23, 2013 - LUND, Sweden--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Regulatory News -  by Cision http://news.cision.com


Alfa Laval (STO:ALFA) -- a world leader in heat transfer, centrifugal separation and fluid handling -- has won an order from MAN Diesel & Turbo to supply Alfa Laval PureSOx exhaust gas cleaning systems for two cruise ships. The order, which is for four scrubbers, is booked in the Marine & Offshore Systems segment. It has a value of approximately SEK 55 million and delivery is scheduled for 2013 and 2014.
The Alfa Laval PureSOx exhaust gas cleaning systems will be installed onboard two luxury cruise liners, where they will remove over 98 percent of the sulphur oxides from the ship's exhaust gas. By combining MAN's engines with Alfa Laval's PureSOx systems, these luxury cruise vessels can continue using heavy fuel oil instead of expensive, low-sulphur fuel and still meet the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) increasingly stringent requirements in Emission Controlled Areas (ECAs).
"This order proves the technical acceptance among the largest players in the marine industry for our Alfa Laval PureSOx system", says Lars Renström, President and CEO of the Alfa Laval Group.
Did you know... that Alfa Laval estimates that 5,000 ships will be affected by the SOx convention, meaning vessels sailing more than 50 percent of their time in the Northern European ECA? Alfa Laval will, among those ships, focus on existing and new vessels with large engines and estimates that app. 1,000 -- 2,000 vessels will be equipped with scrubbers over a five year period.
About Alfa Laval
Alfa Laval is a leading global provider of specialized products and engineering solutions based on its key technologies of heat transfer, separation and fluid handling.
The company's equipment, systems and services are dedicated to assisting customers in optimizing the performance of their processes. The solutions help them to heat, cool, separate and transport products in industries that produce food and beverages, chemicals and petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals, starch, sugar and ethanol.
Alfa Laval's products are also used in power plants, aboard ships, in the mechanical engineering industry, in the mining industry and for wastewater treatment, as well as for comfort climate and refrigeration applications.
Alfa Laval's worldwide organization works closely with customers in nearly 100 countries to help them stay ahead in the global arena.
Alfa Laval is listed on Nasdaq OMX, and, in 2012, posted annual sales of about SEK 29.8 billion (approx. 3.5 billion Euros). The company has today about 16 400 employees.
www.alfalaval.com

Post to be found at:
http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20130423-902567.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
TopOfBlogs

Monday, April 22, 2013

Gas Investment Overtakes Tankers - Explosive Story - Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

Posted - Monday, 22 April 2013 | 00:00 - Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

The case for LNG as a major bulk trade is compelling. Methane is a green fuel with vast onshore and offshore reserves stranded far from consumer markets. The technology to transport the gas as a liquid was developed in the 1940s and the first cargo shipped in 1959 from Lake Charles, USA to the UK on board a converted Liberty ship the Methane Pioneer. It's a natural.
Vaporizing Hopes
But waiting for the LNG trade to hit the big time has been painful - like watching grass grow. It’s nearly 50 years since the first purpose-built LNG ship, Methane Progress, was built, but by 1st April 2013 there were still only 372 LNG carriers, with no change since early-2012. With energy prices high and environmental pressure higher LNG should be much bigger. So what's the problem?
Chilly World
Actually, a 50 year development lag is not unusual in shipping. Sailing ships were still built in 1900, 50 years after steamships appeared. And the first oil tanker was built in 1886, but the trade did not take off until after the 1950s. But three features of the LNG business make trade growth difficult.
Heavy Project Costs
The first is project infrastructure which has made the LNG trade inflexible. Liquefaction trains and re-gas plants need multi-billion dollar investments. And the ships are expensive. A 160,000m³ LNG vessel costs $200m; an Aframax oil tanker $47m. Such big bucks mean arguments over pricing, and have delayed projects for years. Even once a project starts, these complex facilities are prone to technical delays.
Big World, No Market, No Pricing
The second related problem is that LNG use is too narrow to support a global market. Fuel-switching between coal and oil involves fairly manageable investment. But LNG delivery requires expensive re-gas and storage facilities and a pipeline distribution network. That's fine in the USA, which has all of the above, but for many consumers it involves major investment. Coastal power utilities are an ideal market, but installing LNG reception facilities is a major step which few have taken.
And, finally, the lack of a market has made LNG pricing problematic. Currently the price of gas in the USA is $3/mcf, but $18/mcf in Japan, suggesting that this is not a global market. The shipping of LNG may be viable, but until there is a pricing system, who will sign up? No wonder LNG is taking a long time to develop.
Fifty Years On and Counting
So there you have it. The LNG trade is looking for its great leap forward, and things may be looking up. In the last two years gas vessel investment has overtaken that for crude oil tankers (see chart), an important milestone. With oil, LNG's main competitor, at sky high prices and the carbon footprint just as high on government agendas, maybe the scene is finally set for LNG to break out and claim
that major role. Have a nice day.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        Source: Clarksons

Post to be found at:
http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/News.aspx?ElementId=f621a6da-2e65-4432-b416-0b3c2a8fd1ab&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily
TopOfBlogs

The world's biggest container ships prepare for delivery - The Globe and Mail

Post - Published Last updated




 In Asia and Europe, ports are preparing for a big arrival — a vessel taller than a 20-storey building, wider than most freeways and 12 times longer than a blue whale, the largest animal alive today. Maersk Line, the world's biggest container shipping operator, is expecting delivery of the first of 20 massive container ships of a new class called the Triple-E in late June.

No port in North or South America is currently able to take the vessels, nor are the newly expanded Panama Canal locks, due to open next year. The Triple-Es will squeeze through the Suez Canal, allowing them to service the China-to-Europe route, bringing in goods but returning mostly empty, save for some scrap metal and plastic waste for recycling.

The ships are called the Triple-E class for the three main purposes behind their creation — economy of scale, energy efficiency and environmental improvement. Four-hundred metres long, 59 metres wide and 73 metres high, Triple-Es will be the largest vessels of any type on the water. Its 18,000 TEU (20-foot container) capacity is large enough to hold 108 million pairs of sneakers.

Maersk Line, a unit of Danish group A.P. Moeller-Maersk, carries more than 15 per cent of all sea-borne containers. "When we bring in these bigger ships, we will take other ships out in order to make sure that overall we don't put more capacity into the trade than we need," said Tim Smith, Maersk’s North Asia chief.


No port in North or South America is currently able to take the vessels, nor are the newly expanded Panama Canal locks, due to open next year. The Triple-Es will squeeze through the Suez Canal, allowing them to service the China-to-Europe route, bringing in goods but returning mostly empty, save for some scrap metal and plastic waste for recycling.

The ships are called the Triple-E class for the three main purposes behind their creation — economy of scale, energy efficiency and environmental improvement. Four-hundred metres long, 59 metres wide and 73 metres high, Triple-Es will be the largest vessels of any type on the water. Its 18,000 TEU (20-foot container) capacity is large enough to hold 108 million pairs of sneakers.

Maersk Line, a unit of Danish group A.P. Moeller-Maersk, carries more than 15 per cent of all sea-borne containers. "When we bring in these bigger ships, we will take other ships out in order to make sure that overall we don't put more capacity into the trade than we need," said Tim Smith, Maersk’s North Asia chief.

 
Post to be found at:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/international-business/the-worlds-biggest-container-ships-prepare-for-delivery/article11281246/?goback=.gde_44626_member_233335482
TopOfBlogs

Maritime Challenges Of 21st Century And Sino-Pak Friendship: A Theoretical Analysis - Eurasia Review

 Posted - Published on April 20, 2013 - By Umm-E-Habiba - Eurasia Review


A perpetual transition is one of the prominent attributes of the international political system. The conversion occurs because of the interplay of several factors. The alterations in the characteristics of revisionist and status quo powers nonetheless play significantly in this endless change. Consequently, states directly experience impact of international political order on their economic and strategic environment from time to time, leading to convergence or divergence of interests between states. Accordingly, in international relations, today’s foe could be friend tomorrow and vice versa. It is under this pattern of a system characterized by varying state-interests that statesmen govern foreign affairs and craft foreign policies of their states. Therefore, the only key to successful and reliable state to state relations is mutual convergence of interests. Only convergence of interest can ensure the possibility of long-term and trust worthy relationships among states.
The coming of twenty-first century has witnessed an intense rise in pressure of growing trade, energy transit and other economic activities between states. Growing dependency of international trade and other economic activities on sea-routes has made state-to-state maritime relations even more crucial. Moreover, a proportional rise in illegal activities on sea domain such as piracy, drug/human trafficking terrorism, environmental issues have added to maritime security challenges. The intensity of the issue demands a proper code of conduct to be followed, in order to ensure secure and safe maritime domain for economic activities. Although this is a matter of global concern, however; keeping in view the peculiar nature of South Asian environment, a rational response from Pakistan was obvious.
In the changing and competitive environment, Pakistan has a multi-layered national interest to protect. The shores of Arabian Sea have a major role in promoting its national interest. Its maritime routes impact several aspects of its national security and economic welfare of the state. Because of this significance of the country‘s maritime domain, it was considered essential to build a strong indigenous naval capability to cope with the growing challenges and threats of twenty-first century. For time to time Pakistan has tried to secure its maritime domain from external threats and challenges yet the state cannot meet these challenges all alone. For this purpose, China was considered to be the most reliable source, and in a decades-long friendship, China has verily proven itself a reliable maritime ally. Of late, the evolving geo-political realities, regional challenges and shared perceptions has given a new impetus to this enduring partnership.
The Sino-Pak maritime relationship can be explained with reference to the aforementioned “mutual convergence of interest” frame of analysis. The relations between Pakistan and China are not only rooted deep in the region’s history but are founded on mutual trust underscored by commonality of interests. Both states share a particular geographical location and common perceptions on myriad regional challenges and threats. The leadership of both sides has always tried to enhance mutual cooperative ties in economic, defence and various other sectors.
Although Sino-Pak defense ties were established in mid 60s, cooperation in the maritime sector had to wait till after the war of 1971, when Pakistan Navy considered it critically urgent to review the naval strategy. An effort got underway to replace mostly WWII vintage ex-British warships. Since China as a policy then did not venture into Blue waters and remained restricted to operations in the coastal or brown waters, PLA Navy had not invested in heavy naval combatants capable of conducting sustained operations in deeper waters. Nonetheless China’s assistance came handy as induction of several Fast Patrol Boats in quick succession in mid 70s was followed by provision of a number of anti-submarine corvettes.
In 80s, PN acquired its first batch of missile boats from China. The era of 90s later saw a new boom in Pak-China maritime collaboration. A number of programs were inked between PN and PLA-N including port calls and bilateral training. Construction of missile craft PNS SHUJAAT and PNS JALALAT equipped with long range surface to surface missiles at KS&EWi was also the result of this expanding collaboration. There has been no looking back since. With PLA- N discarding its early strategy of inshore operations and duly replacing it with operations in the wider and larger sea expanse of Pacific and Indian Oceans, its technology, weapon, sensors and construction of large ships skills and thinking has undergone massive shift. A key lesson drawn by Pakistan Navy both during and following the cold war era was that for provision of ships and advance technology necessary in naval warfare, it could not wholly depend on foreign equipment manufacturers and suppliers. The PN-PLA Navy have fortunately and triumphantly ushered into an era of collaboration which is marked by the construction of large surface combatants.
In 2005 a contractual deal with ToT was signed between PN and PLA Navy. According to the stipulations, four F-22 P class Frigates were to be delivered to Pakistan Navy. Out of these, three were to be constructed in Chinese Shipyard, while the fourth was to be constructed in Pakistan at KS&EW with Chinese assistance. While three Chinese built frigates have since become integral part of PN fleet, the last one PNS ASLAT, being built at the Karachi Shipyard is expected to be formally commissioned in the PN fleet in April, 2013.
From a pure strategic and economic perspective, the commissioning of PNS ASLAT while being a giant leap towards indigenization of warship construction in Pakistan, it also revitalizes and breathes a new life in KSEW to become a viable state enterprise capable of undertaking similar orders from regional countries in future.
PNS ASLAT had successfully gone through Harbour and Sea trials in 2011 and 2012 respectively. Outfitted with cutting edge combat system and technology, the ship is capable of multiple operations including anti-submarine and anti-surface. It has a Z9EC helicopter onboard which can conduct variety of operations. With the integration of four modern frigates, Pakistan Navy’s potential in securing national maritime interests in the far reaches of the western Indian Ocean has received a tremendous boost. It has also spiked the level of confidence in Sino-Pak maritime relationship and is a landmark achievement for both navies.
China’s regular participation in multinational exercise AMAN, organized by PN, since 2007 onwards; its role in construction of Pakistan’s deep water port Gwadar and later on acquiring its operational rights, and rendering technological and professional assistance in the construction of Fast Attack Missile Craft at Karachi shipyard, are also landmarks of Sino-Pak maritime cooperation.
Energy is going to be the most influential factor behind shaping and reshaping international relations in the twenty-first century. Because of energy reserves and its transit, the significance of maritime domain of the Indian Ocean, which Pakistan and China both share through the Arabian Sea, is going to rise further in this “energy-century”, leading to proportional increase in the significance of their maritime cooperation. World is gradually moving towards a multi-polar system, where there would be more than one centers of economic and military power. Such a change would require from smaller powers to align themselves with larger groups of states to serve their needs. Whereas, having uninterrupted supply of goods, oil, raw materials for economic needs and security of their strategic sphere would require from the major powers to have strong ties with neighbouring states. Moreover, to prevent high seas from anarchy, multilateral cooperation appears to be the only viable option.
Beijing and Islamabad thus share many areas of common interests which solidify their friendship and co-operation. The maritime domain is just one such area which highlights the depth and intensity of their friendship. Therefore, this possible scenario strengthens the hypothesis that the convergence of interest does help forging a long-term and reliable relationship between two states.
About the author: Umm-E-Habiba is MSc. IR and a research-analyst of Pakistan and global affairs specifically maritime affairs.

Post to be found at:
http://www.eurasiareview.com/20042013-maritime-challenges-of-21st-century-and-sino-pak-friendship-a-theoretical-analysis/
TopOfBlogs

EPA Finalizes Vessel General Permit - AGC of America

Posted - April 19, 2013 - AGC of America

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently issued its final National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) general permit, regulating discharges, including ballast water, from commercial vessels. EPA’s 2013 Vessel General Permit (VGP) will replace the 2008 VGP when it expires on Dec. 19, 2013.  The permit provides the practices and procedures for owners and operators of vessels to comply with federal NPDES requirements.

The 2013 VGP applies to owners and operators of commercial vessels that are at least 79 feet in length, excluding military and recreational vessels, operating within the “waters of the United States,” which includes the territorial seas. Construction companies involved in marine operations that own or operate such vessels (e.g., ferries, barges, tugs, cargo freighters, etc.) should take note of the more stringent requirements under the new permit. The VGP does not apply to commercial fishing vessels (at least for now) or to non-recreational vessels less than 79 feet in length; currently, a Congressional moratorium exempts all incidental discharges, with the exception of ballast water, from those vessels until Dec. 2014.  EPA plans to release a separate, streamlined permit soon for vessels less than 79 feet (Small Vessel General Permit for Discharges Incidental to the Normal Operation of Vessels Less Than 79 Feet) – see below for additional details.
EPA’s 2013 VGP and related documents are available on EPA’s website at http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/vessels/vgpermit.cfm.
What You Need to Know

The most notable difference between the 2013 VGP and the 2008 VGP is the inclusion of numeric effluent limits, applicable to vessels with ballast water tanks (expressed as the maximum concentration of living organisms in ballast water, as opposed to the current non-numeric requirements).  The permit also contains maximum discharge limitations for biocides and residuals compounds in ballast water.  These changes were made in response to the terms of a settlement reached with the state of Michigan and several environmental groups.
The numeric effluent limits in the VGP would not apply to all vessels.  Where applicable, vessel operators can meet the new effluent limitations in four ways—
  1. Treat the ballast water prior to discharge to achieve the numeric limits.
  2. Transfer the ballast water to a third-party for treatment.
  3. Use municipal or potable water for ballast.
  4. Do not discharge ballast water.
The 2013 VGP also prohibits discharging of ballast water into sensitive areas such as marine preserves, shellfish beds, or coral reefs. In addition, the permit contains additional environmental protection for the Great Lakes.
In addition, the 2013 VGP imposes a variety of changes for non-ballast water discharges.  For example, it requires new vessels to use technically feasible “environmentally acceptable lubricants” in their oil-to-sea interfaces. The permit also requires vessel operators to monitor their exhaust effluent, along with ballast water, bilgewater, and graywater if they discharge under the VGP.
The 2013 VGP clarifies that permittees may use electronic recordkeeping; eliminates certain duplicative reporting requirements; and allows for consolidated reporting for certain vessels.  However, there is one significant recordkeeping change. Those owners/operators who are not required to submit an NOI under the 2013 permit to obtain coverage must now complete and keep a Permit Authorization and Record of Inspection (PARI) form onboard their vessel at all times, for purposes of certifying that the owner or operator has read and agreed to comply with the VGP.
Small VGP Pending Final Action
EPA also published a draft Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) in December 2011. The draft sVGP would regulate incidental discharges from vessels less than 79 feet long, which have been exempt from non-ballast water permit requirements due to a Congressional moratorium that is currently set to expire in December 2014.  EPA is currently reviewing comments on the draft sVGP and intends to issue a final permit later this year.

Post to be found at:
http://news.agc.org/2013/04/19/epa-finalizes-vessel-general-permit/
TopOfBlogs

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Uniter States - National Ocean Policy Implementation Plan

National Ocean Policy Implementation Plan

To translate President Obama's National Policy for the Stewardship of the Ocean, Our Coasts, and the Great Lakes into on-the-ground actions to benefit the American people, the National Ocean Council released the National Ocean Policy Implementation Plan.  The Implementation Plan describes specific actions Federal agencies will take to address key ocean challenges, give states and communities greater input in Federal decisions, streamline Federal operations, save taxpayer dollars, and promote economic growth.
The Council developed the Implementation Plan over the past two years with extensive input from national, regional, and local stakeholders from all marine sectors; tribal, State and local governments; and the private sector, scientists and the public.
In early 2012, the National Ocean Council released for public comment the draft Implementation Plan. The final Implementation Plan incorporates suggestions on the draft, including key support for local and regional capacity and self-determination, and the development of more and better information related to ocean conditions. The plan specifies that regional stakeholders will determine the scope, scale and content of collaborative marine planning, that participation is voluntary, and that regional planning bodies will be established only in regions that want them.
Click here to read the press release.
View fact sheets about:
Click here to read the Implementation Plan.
Click here to read the Implementation Plan Appendix.
Click here to read the Draft Implementation Plan and the public comments received.

The Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force

On June 12, 2009, President Obama sent a memorandum to the heads of executive departments and Federal agencies establishing an Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force and charged it with developing recommendations to enhance national stewardship of the ocean, coasts, and Great Lakes. The Task Force released interim reports for public comment in September 2009 and December 2009, and received and reviewed close to 5,000 written comments from Congress, stakeholders, and the public before finalizing its recommendations. President Obama signed an Executive Order on July 19, 2010 adopting the Final Recommendations and establishing a National Policy for the Stewardship of the Ocean, Coasts, and Great Lakes.
Read the Final Recommendations of the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force

From:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/oceans/policy.
TopOfBlogs