ShareThis

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Green end for Hoëgh Traveller - Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

Posted - Wednesday - February 27, 201 - Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

The pure car and truck carrier Hoëgh Traveller has today been sold to Grieg Green for environmentally friendly recycling in China.
This is the second car carrier sold by Hoëgh Autoliners to Grieg Green for recycling since the ro/ro transport specialist implemented an environmentally friendly end of life policy for its vessels in 2009. Grieg Green will act as the buyer of the vessel and resell Hoëgh Traveller to a Chinese recycling yard where it will then ensure the disposal of the ship meets certain green criteria.
"This is the 12th car carrier we have sold for green recycling and we are pleased that Grieg Green will supply services to safeguard safe and environmentally friendly recycling," says Ingar Skiaker, ceo of Höegh Autoliners. "Our concern for safety and the environment applies all the way through the vessel's life."
"Grieg Green has been set up to provide shipowners with services for planning, monitoring and reporting green recycling," says Petter Heier, ceo of Grieg Green AS. "We have successfully recycled several vessels and we are pleased that Höegh Autoliners again has entrusted us to handle this project."
Source: Seatrade-Global 

Post to be found at:
http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/News.aspx?ElementId=6318b48b-f92b-40c3-879a-565778ae2112&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily
TopOfBlogs

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Work begins on updating inventory of GHG from international shipping - IMO

Posted - Briefing: 06, February 25, 2013 - IMO

International experts are meeting at IMO Headquarters this week, in the form of an Expert Workshop, to begin work on updating the inventory of greenhouse gases (GHG) from international shipping, with a view to providing reliable and up-to-date information on which IMO, through its Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), might base its work on further measures to reduce GHG.
 
The Second IMO GHG Study 2009 estimated that international shipping emitted 870 million tonnes, or about 2.7% of the global man-made emissions of CO2 in 2007. An updated GHG inventory is considered necessary as the current estimate contained in the Second study does not take account of the economic downturn experienced globally since 2008.  Exhaust gases are the primary source of GHG emissions from ships, with carbon dioxide the most important GHG, both in terms of quantity and of global warming potential. An updated inventory would also provide a baseline to enable the impact to be assessed of technical and operational energy efficiency measures for international shipping that entered into force on 1 January 2013.
 
The MEPC, at its sixty-fourth session in October 2012 endorsed, in principle, the outline for an update of the GHG emissions estimate. The Expert Workshop, meeting from 26 February to  1 March 2013, will further consider the methodology and assumptions to be used in the update. The Expert Workshop is expected to provide a summary of its deliberations as a report on its work to MEPC 65, meeting in May this year.

In addition to carbon dioxide (CO2), a global GHG inventory of emissions of GHGs and relevant substances emitted from ships, engaged in international transport could include: methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), subject to data availability. 
 
Other relevant substances that may contribute to climate change include: nitrogen oxides (NOx), non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM) and sulphur oxides (SOx).
IMO has already adopted technical and operational measures to reduce emissions of GHG from international shipping. The Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) was made mandatory for new ships and the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) for all ships, under amendments to MARPOL Annex VI adopted in 2011. These amendments entered into force on 1 January 2013.  

An article explaining the technical and operational measures already adopted can be found here.
 
Post to be found at:
http://www.imo.org/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/06-ghg-expert-group.aspx
TopOfBlogs

Monday, February 25, 2013

Shared responsibilities for garbage disposal - Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

Posted - Sunday, 24 February 2013 | 00:00 - Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

 MARPOL Annex V, with its various prescriptions for the handling of garbage, has been in force since the beginning of this month, with all the responsibilities, liabilities and requirements that this means. Well-organised ship operators will have been onto this matter for ages and will have anticipated the requirements and briefed their crews accordingly, putting in place measures to better organise and control the various waste streams that are generated aboard their ships.
They will be unlikely to be embarrassed when inspectors board to check on the garbage management plans and respective record books, and to assess the awareness and level of compliance. These visitors will be looking to see a placard prominently placed to inform all on board about what can be discharged into the sea, and where. It is to be noted that International Maritime Organization (IMO) has helpfully made available such an informative placard, providing a simplified overview of the new provisions.
Like so many of the regulations that devolve upon the operation of ships in the 21st century, it is the Master of the ship who is given the prime responsibility of seeing that the provisions of MARPOL Annex V are implemented. It is pointed out that the burden of proof lies on the Master for preventing the throwing into the sea of anything that should not be so disposed of and for demonstrating that such an offence did not take place.
But is this always as clear as the regulations seem to suggest? Cargo residues, for instance, may be put overside with the ship en route and more than 12 miles from the nearest land, but only if such substances are not harmful to the marine environment. That seems clear enough, just as long as port and coastal states agree with the Master as to what is “harmful” and what is not. Similarly, cleaning agents contained in wash water will hopefully be benign and not harmful, but if a shoreside official in some wayport rules otherwise, where will this leave the Master?
As is normal in these matters, the burden for compliance seems to fall most heavily upon the ship, even though the responsibility for disposing of these wastes in a safe and environmentally sound manner is surely shared between the ship and port. For the ship, there is no escape from the burden of the regulations. It generates the wastes and must obey the regulations in every respect, ensuring that the wastes are retained on board if there is no means of landing them.
The port, on the other hand, retains the whip hand and the easy way out, when it can merely inform the ship that it is not permitted to land its wastes there because there are no suitable reception arrangements. It is able to make such pronouncements at the same time as its inspectors are busy aboard the ship checking the vessel’s compliance with Annex V. But whereas the ship and its Master can be subject to all manner of penalties if faults are found in its Annex V compliance arrangements, there is no equivalent penalties adhering to the port and its management for its failure to provide reasonable reception facilities. It is not that people operating ships are not 100% behind the changes. Everyone afloat knows that the sea is not a garbage dump and that waste disposal must be properly managed. It is just that sometimes they would like others to realise that this desirable result is a shared responsibility.
Source: BIMCO

Post to be found at:
http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/News.aspx?ElementId=7bc6877d-cada-4288-abec-8ebd963534f0&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily
TopOfBlogs

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

LNG ship fuels are gathering momentum, in shipping industry's effort to reduce harmful emissions - Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

Posted - Wednesday, 20 February 2013 | 00:00 - Nikos Roussanoglou, Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

In a multi-tier market that differentiates between vessels based on their efficiency, the newly bred "Eco-Ships" will result in significantly improved employment opportunities and earnings for these energy optimised vessels, says Mr. Athanasios Reisopoulos, Vice President, Area Office Southern Europe of Germanischer Lloyd Hellas M.E.P.E. In an interview with Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide, Mr. Reisopoulos discussed the latest measures in effect regarding reducing emissions and better streamlining a ship owner's operations, the prospects of LNG as a leading shipping fuel, as well as GL's market-leading products and services, aimed at aiding ship owners achieve better fuel-efficiency.

Among the key issues that the shipping industry is facing today has to do with the reduction of shipping emissions, which not only benefits the environment, but also ship owners, since they can reduce their operating costs, through the respective fall in fuel consumption. What types of package services does GL offer ship owners towards this direction?

Reducing the emissions from the shipping industry is the focus of a great deal of imminent regulation and software systems that help to give owners and charterers a transparent and comprehensive assessment of the environmental performance of their vessels are in ever greater use. Not only in terms of emissions to air, where Sulphur limits will soon come into place, but in terms of ballast water, other liquid waste and solid rubbish.
There are a number of operational systems that aid efficiency and reducing environmental impacts already in use today including: trim optimisation, engine system performance optimisation, weather routing, voyage execution and performance monitoring. GL’s SeaScout system is an integrated onboard system that provides ships’ officers with decision-making support.
GL also recently launched the new GL EmissionManager system to track and record the total picture of a vessel’s or an entire fleet’s emissions. The system can record and analyse all emissions, including the environmental, operational and state data. This can then be used to build up a picture of the vessel, and used for comparison purposes within a fleet, as well as to support certification and approval applications.
Input into the system can be triggered by events and the process ensures data quality through plausibility and completeness checks. Collected by an onboard recorder this data is transferred to GL’s “Green Server” where it can be accessed securely via the web. GL’s FleetManager analysis software can then generate reports for entire or individual fleets, which can be accessed by the ship owner or operator.
FutureShip, GL’s consulting subsidiary offers a number of services and products, including the award winning ECO-Assistant trim optimiser. Trim is one of the central drivers of energy efficiency in ship operation and the system delivers an optimum trim angle for a specific ship with the input of only a few simple operational parameters, such as current speed, displacement and water depth. It can be applied to all kinds of vessels, including container vessels and bulk carriers and installed on any computer, requiring no modifications to the ship and no interfaces with the vessel’s systems.

During 2013 a number of new regulations are expected to come into force, which are going to impact the day-to-day operation of shipping companies. Could you highlight the most important ones and how do you think they are going to impact the maritime business?


An increased focus on the environmental performance of the maritime industry as a whole has led to the introduction of the first global industry wide measures to combat CO2 emissions – the EEDI and the SEEMP. These measures, took effect at the beginning of 2013, will have a sweeping effect on most of the world’s commercial sea going vessels and owners must be prepared for their introduction.
Envisioned as a management tool to assist a company in improving energy efficiency of ships in operation, a SEEMP must be specific for each ship in a fleet and should be used together with established environmental management systems. A SEEMP allows companies to reduce fuel consumption through simple operational measures and making investments that can improve performance and pay off in reduced costs.
The SEEMP has the potential to enhance the deployment of data sharing and the modern software tools that go along with the sophisticated analysis of a vessel’s and a fleet’s performance. It also seems certain to increase the commercial pressure on inefficient operators as companies which take advantage of fuel saving measures are driven to maximise their efficiencies. Vessels with a SEEMP in place has already shown to make marked improvements in fuel consumption and as the processes and systems become more familiar to the shipping industry this seems certain to grow.
On the other hand the EEDI will continue to develop and improve and its full application will really only be seen in the future as ever more efficient vessels. Increasingly, however, we are seeing that clients are coming to GL for early certification of their vessels, and in some cases their entire fleets, as they see the EEDI as a way to demonstrate the investments they have made in efficiency gains in their vessels.
The Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC 2006) will also have a significant impact on shipowners, managers, crewing agencies and most importantly the seafarers on-board. With its entry into force this year, the MLC 2006 will consolidate some 37 ILO conventions and require the certification of over 55,000 seagoing vessels. Preparing for this sea change will require a massive adjustment and impact on every level of an organisation. Around 50,000 ships will have to be inspected and certified before the MLC 2006 enters into force.
The MLC 2006 Convention requires the documentation of many crewing processes including: checking that all required positions on board filled, that the seafarers are medically fit, well trained and qualified for the duties they are assigned to, and that records are maintained of the seafarers’ daily hours of work and rest.

LNG is among the most promising new fuels soon to be widely available to ship owners who wish to use this as their vessels' leading energy source. GL has long been campaigning for the benefits from the use of LNG as a shipping fuel. Which are the benefits of this fuel, both in terms of costs entailed, as well as environmentally?

LNG fuelled ships will have overall lower Co2 emissions. However the real benefit from LNG comes in terms of local emissions – SOx, NOx and particulates and this is where it has the greatest advantages over HFO. An LNG fuelled vessel will also have a better EEDI. In the absence of methane slip, LNG has a lower carbon content than standard HFO and therefore assuming all other design characteristics are equal a LNG fuelled ship will have a better EEDI.
As ever the prime consideration in LNG adoption will be fuel price, as we can see from the MAN/GL containership study. The actual fuel cost we will see delivered depends upon how the bunkering and infrastructure develops, as well as the overall gas market as gas becomes increasingly important for power generation around the world.

Do you believe that the infrastructure necessary to implement LNG bunkering is available at the moment? When do you expect this market to fully develop?

I think we can clearly see from the growing emphasis in the industry and the steady flow of news reports that LNG as a ship fuel is really starting to gather momentum. So I expect that over the next few years we will see an increasingly rapid uptake of this technology, spreading at first from areas where ECAs will soon enter into force and then as bunkering infrastructure grows and spreads from regional through to the major trade routes.
The publication of the EU Clean Fuel Strategy also shows how this development might progress, with the plan proposing that LNG refuelling stations be installed in all 139 maritime and inland ports on the Trans European Core Network by 2020 and 2025 respectively. So in the next 5 to 10 year I think we can expect to have a market that is fairly well developed.

2012 saw the emergence of the so-called "Eco Ships" in the market, which are usually commanding a premium price, versus more conventional new building vessels. Many ship owners still appear to be sceptical towards those vessels, claiming that their advertised benefits in terms of fuel consumption are still unproven. What's your view on this? Are Eco Ships going to dominate the market in the coming years and why?

In a word – YES. A split between newly optimized Eco ships and less efficient tonnage has the potential of splitting the world fleet into the haves and have-nots. Fuel efficiency is now the biggest lever to increase cost competitiveness with bunkers costs rising to more than one third of a vessel’s total operating costs. The best operators have already taking note of this trend, with a study conducted by GL’s consultancy subsidiary FutureShip revealing that the differences in design efficiency in major container liner fleets was substantial. Top players in the market were designing and building vessels to the IMO’s 2025 EEDI reference line today – some 30% more efficient that the average vessel. The new GL class Carisbrooke Super Green 8500 Vessels, for example, utilised a number of features which resulted in a 30% lower EEDI. The four dry cargo vessels have a hydro-dynamically optimized hull form, special bow form, and an extremely large and efficient ducted propeller, all of which result in an extremely efficient vessel..
In a multi-tier market that differentiates between vessels based on their efficiency, this will result in significantly improved employment opportunities and earnings for energy optimised vessels. These benefits stem from three sources: the design of new vessels for lower speed, the utilization of state-of- the-art optimisation technology and services, and significantly lower newbuilding prices. With the entry of optimised vessels into the market, cost pressures on existing vessels will continue to mount, making the importance of making efficiency gains, especially in operational strategies, increasingly important.
We are already seeing owner/operators – Maersk in a notable example in 2012 – refitting relatively new existing ships to make them more efficient for slower speed operation. This is a trend that is not going away and the best operators are already well ahead on this front.

Post found at:
http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/News.aspx?ElementId=4e6e4ae0-4b65-446a-a24d-d00f64ed821d&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily
TopOfBlogs

Monday, February 18, 2013

Warning of low flash point bunker fuel in Vyborg, Russia: DNVPS - Platts.com

 Posted - Singapore (Platts)--18Feb2013/805 am EST/1305 GMT -Platts.com

Goh Shu Hui, shu_hui_goh@platts.com - --Edited by Jonathan Dart, jonathan_dart@platts.com

Three high sulfur bunker fuel samples taken from bunker deliveries made in Vyborg, Russia, have shown low flash points, according to a DNV Petroleum Services bunker alert seen by Platts Monday.
The bunker alert, obtained via market sources, showed flash points of 46-50 degrees Celsius, below the ISO 8217:2005/2010/2012 parameter of a minimum 60 C.
The samples were from deliveries made January 8-26.
Marine fuels with a flash point below the minimum 60 C violate a number of regulations across different ports and such fuels are typically regarded as dangerous because they combust at lower temperatures than expected, which could result in safety breaches or accidents, market sources said.
DNVPS also recommended safety measures in its alert that workers in the vicinity of fuel storage tanks and vents should avoid smoking or bringing any other heat source near these fuels.

Post to be found at:
http://www.platts.com/RSSFeedDetailedNews/RSSFeed/Shipping/8157204
TopOfBlogs

Nanoparticles To Reduce Fuel Use On Containerships - Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

Posted - Tuesday, 19 February 2013 | Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

Nanoparticle additives are to be used on up to fifty American President Lines (APL) containerships in a move to reduce fuel consumption.
The additives are to be manufactured by Neftech Pte Ltd, a subsidiary of China Auto Corporation (CAC), and will be regularly applied to the auxiliary engines of each ship over a five-year period.
This nanoparticle technology is designed to reduce friction through the engine oil. It can also be used alongside Neftech's water emulsion technology, which works directly on the fuel to make it burn more efficiently. Both technologies complement each other and reduce fuel use.
Neftech said it has already installed water emulsion plants on seven container ships from three companies and is in the process of adding more.
According to Neftech, APL has conducted six months of field testing of the nanoparticle additives on one of its containerships, achieving fuel savings of more than 10 percent.
"Ten per cent may not sound like a lot but when it comes to fuel savings for the shipping industry, it is a lot of money," stated Neftech chairman Victor Levin, speaking to the Business Times.
The Neftech website also states that the water emulsion technology can save 7.6 percent of fuel use of on main engines and 8.6 percent on auxiliary engines on a 2,600 twenty-foot-equivalent-unit (TEU) containership.
The nanoparticle technology is currently being field tested on a containership main engine.
 

Source: Fathom- ctech 
 
Post to be found at:
http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/News.aspx?ElementId=75ef00a7-7a4b-4564-80b7-4d050cfc230c&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily
TopOfBlogs

DNV and PSE found ways to store and capture CO2 on board ships - Maritime Propulsion

Another post on this topic:
By Peter Pospiech at February 18, 2013 06:12  


Det Norske Veritas (DNV), a leading classification society, and Process Systems Enterprise Ltd. (PSE), a global provider of advanced process modelling technology, recently have released the results of the Maritime CCS (carbon capture and storage) research and development project.
The project has successfully developed a concept design for on-board chemical CO2 capture. The system consists of a chemical absorption plant that separates CO2 from flue gases, a liquefaction unit where the captured CO2 is compressed and condensed using a refrigerant and two storage tanks where the liquid CO2 product is temporarily stored until discharge into transmission and storage infrastructures at the next suitable port. The results show that the concept is technically feasible and capable of reducing ship CO2 emissions by up to 65%. For a VLCC tanker, this could correspond to capturing more than 70,000 tonnes of CO2 per year, transforming them from emissions to a tradable product.
 
 "Process schematic for the carbon capture process on a typical vessel"
“In response to more stringent environmental regulations and complex market conditions, we see an increased demand for innovative solutions towards higher efficiency and greener operations,” says Dr. Nikolaos Kakalis, Head of DNV Research & Innovation Greece. “Our R&D activities, such as the carbon capture initiative which is completely new in the field of maritime transportation, pave the future towards next-generation solutions for achieving more energy-efficient, environmentally friendly and sustainable maritime transportation”.
Prof. Costas Pantelides, Managing Director of PSE, says “This has been a challenging design problem with tight constraints. Applying a model-based engineering approach has been key to exploring the process decision space rapidly and effectively, and developing technically feasible and economically viable solutions.”

"Location of the carbon capture process on a typical vessel. The capture process is aft and the CO2storage tanks are in front of the superstructure"
Maritime CO2 emissions are estimated at over 1000 million tonnes per year, or 3% of total emissions, and are expected to reach 2000 to 3000m tonnes by 2050. The UK government has included maritime emissions in the reduction targets set by the Climate Change Bill, and the International Maritime Organisation is expected to drive a reduction in emissions from international shipping. Because ship emissions are concentrated – unlike other forms of transport – the potential to capture CO2 at source has been the key focus of the project.
The Maritime CCS project was jointly financed by the two partners, the UK’s Technology Strategy Board and the Research Council of Norway under the EUROSTARS initiative. The project took into account the unique challenges posed by the maritime environment – constant movement, limited space and access to utilities, stringent safety requirements and the need for energy efficiency.

image: courtesy of Process Systems Enterprise and DNV

Post to be found at:
http://articles.maritimepropulsion.com/article/DNV-and-PSE-found-ways-to-store-and-capture-CO2-on-board-ships59266.aspx
TopOfBlogs

Doing some catch-up

First some links to some thing I found interesting over the last week but did not have time to post
and  the one or two full items I have found over the weekend.

Norway: DNV, PSE Report on Ship Carbon Capture and Storage

http://worldmaritimenews.com/archives/76459

 

Binational study: maritime shipping more fuel-efficient, “greener” than land transportation

 http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20130212/NEWS03/702129909

 

Project paves way for lower maritime CO emissions

http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_wsite2_1_12/02/2013_482870

 

 

 

 

TopOfBlogs

Monday, February 11, 2013

positive developments on ballast water management - Intertanko

IMO member states this week agreed on a proposal to undertake a trial period for port state control sampling and analysis once the International Ballast Water Management Convention (BWMC) has entered into force.
Acknowledging that there remains a great deal of uncertainty about the methods used to sample ballast water and the real concerns of the industry as expressed in INTERTANKO’s paper to the IMO last year, the IMO’s Sub-Committee for Bulk Liquids and Gases (BLG 17) has set out a procedure for port states to trial sampling techniques. Importantly, during this trial period port state control (PSC) will refrain from initiating criminal sanctions or detaining the vessel should the sampling show that the discharged ballast water does not meet the standards in the BWMC.
The issue was brought about originally at the previous BLG meeting held in early 2012 when concerns were aired by the industry that the methods for sampling and analysis being proposed for use by PSC were actually more stringent than those being used to test the ballast water management systems (BWMS) during Type Approval. In the submission to the IMO’s MEPC 64 in October 2012, INTERTANKO and its co-sponsors expanded on the concern explaining that this could mean that type-approved systems which are operated according to the manufacturers’ specifications and as per the Type Approval could be proven to be non-compliant if the discharge is tested by PSC.
This led to INTERTANKO reiterating its concerns this week and stressing the need to ensure that the sampling and analyses procedures are no more stringent than what is required for Type Approval of the BWMS. It should be noted, however, that during this trial period port states will still have the authority to issue deficiencies and detain vessels should the certification and necessary ballast water management documentation be deemed in contravention of the BWMC requirements.
The trial will commence once the BWMC has entered into force and will initially run for two years. After this period a review will be conducted by the IMO to assess which methods should continue to be used and to amend the sampling and analysis protocols as necessary. The proposal has been forwarded to the BLG parent Committee, MEPC, for its approval and adoption when it meets in May this year.
Meanwhile, INTERTANKO’s joint submission aimed at increasing the transparency of the Type Approval process was well received with amendments accepted to both the Type Approval certification documents as well as the guidance to Administrations on the Type Approval process. It is anticipated that with these amendments accepted, the revised documents will result in more information provided to the industry and owners on the capabilities of BWMSs as well as the ranges and limiting conditions in which the BWMS can operate.
Both revised documents will be sent to MEPC 65 for adoption in May.
TopOfBlogs

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Norway is teaming up in pole position for battery-powered ships - Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

Posted - Thursday, 07 February 2013 | 00:00- Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

The Norwegian shipping industry is teaming up and has taken a leading role in developing battery-powered ships. The first four hybrid vessels will start to sail in 2013/14. In 2015, they will be followed by the world largest fully electric ferry, which will regularly cross Norway’s largest fjord. Some 120 managers representing the entire maritime cluster were gathered at a DNV seminar last week. “15 years ago, the Norwegian cluster was looking into opportunities for gas-fuelled ships. Today, Norway is the front-runner when it comes to LNG-fuelled ships. Electricity stored in batteries on board ships is another opportunity in the future energy mix and another technology race has started. We have been running that track for a while already,” says Narve Mjøs, Director of Battery Projects in DNV and in charge of the seminar.
“International shipping is facing a tough time with escalating fuel prices, stricter environmental regulations and very low day rates caused by overcapacity in most segments. It’s during tough times that innovation is most important and also more efficient, as the purpose and goals become so much clearer,” says Remi Eriksen, CEO of DNV Maritime and Oil & Gas. “The Norwegian maritime industry is at the innovation forefront, and the world looks to Norway for technology and best practice. Innovation is not only something the industry wants. It is also necessary for survival.”
The first evidence of battery innovation, the first hybrid offshore supply ship, will start to operate within a few weeks. The Viking Lady, owned by Eidesvik Offshore, will have a battery package installed this spring. Later on, Norled will install a battery package on board an existing diesel-electric ferry. Norled intends to use this experience in building and operating their fully electric ferry. This will cross the Sognefjord 34 times a day, 7 days a week, transporting at a maximum 120 cars and 360 passengers - starting in 2015.
The Edda Ferd, owned by Østensjø, is another hybrid vessel with battery and diesel-electric propulsion that will start to sail this autumn.
Hybrid systems will reduce the energy consumption. When an offshore supply vessel is operating on dynamic positioning, there will be a major fuel saving potential. And when in harbour, the vessel should be able to simply use power stored in the batteries, which again will have a positive impact on the environment. Additional benefits are related to the reduction in the machinery maintenance cost and in noise and vibrations.
“Hybrid ships are similar to the well-known hybrid cars, like the Toyota Prius,” says Remi Eriksen. “A major advantage of these ships is that the payback time on additional investments is expected to be 2-4 years compared to more than 10 years for cars.”
Eriksen drives a fully electric car himself. Car industry figures can be used to illustrate how batteries are perceived as an alternative in Norway and as an example of the attention paid to them. Every fifth electric car sold in Western Europe in 2011 was sold in Norway, while in total only one out of 100 Western European cars were sold in this country during the same year.
The trend towards more use of electricity and batteries on board ships is expected to continue. New rules, tools and advisory services for battery-powered ships have already been developed by DNV. The Norwegian authorities are taking an active role, as they did when gas was being developed as an alternative fuel, and are pushing the maritime industry by setting strict requirements to reduce emissions, as well as offering incentives. As a result of last week’s seminar, yards, owners, the supply industry and R&D institutions are all eager and well prepared for the future.

Post to be found at:
http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/News.aspx?ElementId=f609f5ea-1910-45e7-823f-b144b94ee988&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily
TopOfBlogs

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Continuous Monitoring to Enable More Accurate Fuel and Emissions Measurement - World Maritime News

Posted on Feb 5th, 2013 - World maritime News

As fuel costs and emissions’ levels come under more scrutiny, paper logbooks and noon reports are no longer the most effective means of monitoring and communicating fuel consumption and emissions data, according to NAPA, the leading software house for ship design and operations.
Currently bunker fuel readings for most international vessels are taken as daily ‘noon reports’ – collected onboard and send to the shipowner on a daily basis during a vessel’s voyage. However, with bunker fuel costs at sustained record levels and environmental legislation pertaining to emissions of Greenhouse Gases (GHGs), Sulphur Oxide (SOx), Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) now in force, many ship owners and management companies have come under more scrutiny from charterers, authorities and other stakeholders, such as investors, to provide more accurate measurement of daily bunker fuel consumption and emissions levels.
Esa Henttinen,Vice President at NAPA for Operations commented:
“Although they have long been the industry standard, 24-hour reports taken at noon from vessels and relayed onshore are starting to have limited use for the owners and operators. As ship owners and managers come under more scrutiny over their fuel costs, environmental and safety credentials, more accuracy and ‘real time’ data is being requested from multiple stakeholders, including charterers, insurers, regulators and financiers. The good news is that the ability to collect more accurate data in real time and send it onshore is available.
“Moreover, from a safety perspective, ‘noon reports’ represent an increasingly significant vulnerability as they cannot provide ship owners and managers with real time information, on safety or performance for example, that can be acted upon immediately.”
According to NAPA research, owners, managers and operators with large numbers of vessels under their control, are increasingly turning to electronic operational solutions that automatically communicate with shore-based offices as frequently as every ten minutes. This gives those with the ultimate responsibility ‘real time’ awareness of a vessel’s fuel consumption, location, the weather conditions it is facing, the speed it is travelling at and further data that can help to ensure that these vessels are operating to the safety and efficiency standards owners, operators, charterers and other stakeholders expect of them.
While there are commercial and safety benefits having more accurate and ‘real time’ data, the latest condition monitoring software has the potential to enable greater effectiveness in the legislative drive to reduce GHG emissions from shipping. Papers were presented at both IMO MEPC meetings in 2012 on the subject of monitoring while the European Commission have declared their intention to pursue mandatory monitoring, reporting and verification of vessel fuel consumption. Industrial installations and the aviation industry already face requirements for measurement and reporting and the technology is there for this to be accomplished by the shipping industry.
These systems also have significant benefits in measuring the effectiveness of any new technologies that have been fitted to the vessel. When the Finnish shipping company Bore wanted to verify efficiency savings from NAPA for Operations SEEMP software and WE Tech Solutions’ Variable Frequency Drive Shaft Generator (VFD SG) application on their Ro-Ro vessel M/V Bore Sea, ‘NAPA Office’ – with real-time reporting and logbooks – was used to record improvements in fuel consumption. ‘NAPA Office’ enabled the continuous monitoring of efficiency, speed, location and other contributing factors before and after the installation of the efficiency solutions allowing Bore to measure the saving they achieved and how they were achieved. This resulted in their awareness that the Speed Optimisation portion of the NAPA suite had saved them 6% in fuel while the VFD SG had provided 10% savings, an important decision-making tool should they look to increase efficiency on other vessels.

Post to be foundat:
http://worldmaritimenews.com/archives/75529
TopOfBlogs

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Maersk urges EU climate and ozone action - mcicontainers.com

Posted - 2/4/2013 12:00 PM - mcicontainers.com

Maersk Container Industry calls for tougher enforcement of European environmental legislation designed to protect the Earth’s ozone layer and help prevent climate change.
“We urge the European Commission to ensure enforcement of existing EU legislation regarding insulation foam in reefer containers,” says Peter K. Nymand, CEO for Maersk Container Industry.
“This would benefit the environment, and it would help European innovation and environmental investments pay off,” Nymand adds.
Current EU legislation bans the “import” or “placing on the market” of reefer containers with significant potential to damage the climate and ozone layer. But thousands of such containers nevertheless circulate in Europe’s internal market on virtually the same market conditions as more environmentally friendly reefers.
SuPoTec®, which was developed and patented by Maersk Container Industry in 2002, does not damage the Earth’s ozone layer, nor does it cause significant climate change. As a result, customers and the World Wildlife Fund WWF laud SuPoTec® for being an environmental step forward.
“This is environmental precaution. It is positive when enterprises, in this case Maersk Container Industry, move ahead of the legislation by developing products and production methods, which in turn make it possible for legislators to demand more from the rest of the industry,” says John Nordbo, head of the Conservation Department at WWF, Denmark.
Customer endorsements:
Siegfried Kuchar, technical superintendent for Liner Services at Deutsche Afrika-Linien, DAL: “We like Star Cool Integrated reefers because the Supotec insulation poses no threat to the ozone layer and causes very little CO2 emission.”
Esben Jakobsen, Manager, Container Management with Royal Arctic Line in Greenland: “We use Maersk Container Industry's reefer containers in an area of the world where one is constantly reminded of the impact of global warming and of the need to protect the climate. Therefore, we are particularly happy about having Supotec insulation foam in our reefers.”
Questions & Answers
What is the problem?We believe that EU regulation 1005/2009 (formerly 2037/2000) was made with good intentions, but the law could function better and further minimise the risk of damage to the Earth’s climate and ozone layer.
You just want to sell more reefer containers, don’t you?
Yes definitely. But in this case, MCI’s SuPoTec® insulation foam technology is good news also for European innovation and for the global environment. SuPoTec® was invented 10 years ago. Each container with SuPoTec® prevents almost 27 tonnes of CO2 emissions. By 1 January 2013, the total SuPoTec® production had offset CO2 emissions equal to what 441,000 Danish citizens emit in one year.
Why is there no clear legal precedent re. “placing on the market”?We suspect there is no actual enforcement of EU regulation 1005/2009 (formerly 2037/2000). Thousands of old reefer containers remain in circulation in Europe, operating in a legal grey zone because the EU Commission gives a grace period if the containers are not “placed on the market” permanently. Therefore, MCI’s competitors have so far not had to make the same environmental investments as MCI did with SuPoTec® in 2002. This neither benefits European innovation, nor the climate.
What is specifically the problem?EU regulation 1005/2009 (formerly 2037/2000) has not helped decrease world demand for the type of reefer container insulation foam (HCFC141b) that can damage the ozone layer and the climate. Such containers can be made at lower cost, and more generally, international investigations, including the EU Commission’s own, have uncovered illegal trade in HCFC gasses. This neither benefits European innovation, nor the climate.
What should happen?we urge the EU Commission to ensure enforcement of EU regulation 1005/2009 (formerly 2035/2000) and give incentives to phase out HCFC141b reefers due to their potential to damage the climate. We believe competition in the EU internal market should be fair, yet MCI’s competitors have so far not had to make the same environmental investments as MCI did with SuPoTec® in 2002. Ultimately, we also believe supermarket customers who like bananas and avocados etc. will appreciate if their products are transported with lowest possible carbon and ozone layer impact.
According to the EU Commission, it is up to member states to implement and enforce regulation 1005/2009?Correct, but according to the law, it is also the EU Commission’s responsibility, for example, to monitor member state enforcement and to investigate illegal trade.
What’s the difference between SuPoTec® and HCFC141b?If released to the atmosphere, HCFC141b will damage the Earth’s ozone layer with an effect of 0.12 on a scale of 1.0 (called ODP). Its potential to cause global warming (GWP) is 725, which means HCFC141b is 725 times more climate-damaging than CO2. SuPoTec® ODP is zero, its GWP is less than 25.
Why is damage to the ozone layer a problem?
The earth’s ozone layer gives natural protection against overexposure of the skin to solar UV radiation that causes sunburn. Chronic sunlight exposure can lead to skin cancers. The global regime to protect the ozone layer is estimated to have prevented tens of millions of cancer deaths and hundreds of millions of cancer and cataract cases globally.

http://www.mcicontainers.com/AboutUs/News/NewsAndPressReleases/Pages/SuPoTec.aspx
TopOfBlogs

Friday, February 1, 2013

Why Company Collaboration on Shipping Emissions is Increasingly Significant - BSR (Business for Social Responsibility)

Posted - January 31, 2013 - Jonathan Morris, Associate, Advisory Services - BSR

It is widely accepted that as a significant contributor to global carbon emissions, the transport sector needs to make environmental improvements in the pursuit of creating a low-carbon economy. Today, around 4 percent of global emissions come from ocean shipping—about equivalent to that of aviation. For global brands, this translates to significant carbon impacts in their own supply chains: Up to 70 percent of carbon emissions during a cargo journey come from the ocean segment.
While the International Maritime Organization has yet to establish a regulatory framework for carbon emissions, the European Commission and various national governments are leaning heavily toward implementing mandatory data measurement, reporting, and verification mechanisms. Indeed, in October 2013, France will enact a law requiring that all carriers providing transport services to and from France provide the carbon footprint of the transport service.
Leading global brands are now setting ambitious targets to reduce emissions from their logistics networks—signaling the increasing relevance of emerging regulations and other drivers. But how can these brands understand and manage how and where to reduce carbon emissions reductions in their logistics chains?
In a recent webinar hosted by partner 2Degrees Network, BSR’s Transport and Logistics practice lead Angie Farrag spoke with Willem Jan Beerthuis, Heineken’s global procurement buyer, and Mads Stensen, Maersk Line’s global advisor for the environment and CSR, about how their participation in BSR's Clean Cargo Working Group helps them measure and report on the environmental impacts in ocean transportation and across the modal chain. The speakers highlighted how Clean Cargo allows them to measure these impacts in a credible, consistent, and comparable way that enhances better business decision making.


Post to be found at:
http://www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/blog-view/why-company-collaboration-on-shipping-emissions-is-increasingly-significant
TopOfBlogs