Posted - April, 26, 2013 - Martin Williams, director, Hong Kong Outdoors - South China Morning Post
There were quick responses to R. E. J. Bunker's letter on marine
accidents, which he believes would become more likely with barge traffic
to and from the planned Shek Kwu Chau waste incinerator ("Incinerator
will raise risk of collisions", April 11).
Artist's Impression of the Shek Kwu Chau Incinerator. Photo: SCMP
Elvis Au, an assistant director of the Environmental Protection
Department ("Traffic generated by waste management facility will be
light, April 17) assured readers that marine transportation will
continue to comply with safety measures.
He blithely ignores the fact that even with these measures, there
have been recent accidents, including the collision between a Cheung
Chau passenger ferry and a barge.
But then, in his role as front man for the mega incinerator project,
Mr Au is adept at ignoring information that suggests it will be anything
but glorious.
At a public meeting last December, I remarked that incineration results in emissions of poisonous chemicals and toxic ash.
Mr Au responded that my information was 40 years out of date -
suggesting he was badly misinformed, as there are a host of reports and
studies on recent health issues with incinerators, including in Macau.
Mr Au also boasted that he is an engineer, and would not do anything
to harm people's health, which to me is like a doctor promising that a
bridge will not collapse.
Along with colleagues, Mr Au has been dismissive of alternatives such as zero-waste strategies and plasma arc technology.
The reasons for such obduracy are hard to fathom.
In the course of two years opposing the mega incinerator, I have
noticed that the only strong support comes from people and businesses
that are involved in the project, or are set to benefit from the HK$23
billion that will be spent on the incinerator island and the associated
work on extending the life of landfills.
Oliver Lam, of Lam Tin - well removed from Shek Kwu Chau - wrote of
our need for advanced incinerators, which "can hardly cause any damage
to people" ("Why we now need modern incinerators", April 16).
In Mr Lam's view, the Shek Kwu Chau site was proposed after a
"prudent, detailed investigation conducted by professionals". Yet, in
reality, the original preferred site was near Tuen Mun, until politics
intervened.
Solutions to the waste problem are indeed required. But these should
be based on science and common sense, not driven by politics and vested
interests.
Post to be found at:
http://www.scmp.com/comment/letters/article/1223218/vested-interests-driving-waste-project
Friday, April 26, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment