Posted - October 11, 2013 - Tanker Operator
The European Union (EU) is still proposing to push forward its initiative to monitor C02 emissions from shipping.
According to an EU paper released back in June, shipping remains the
only transport mode not included in the EU’s GHG emissions reduction
commitment and currently accounts for 4% of the European total.
Globally, the maritime transport sector accounts for 3% of emissions,
but this is expected to rise to 5% by 2050, despite the introduction of
mandatory and operational efficiency measures, such as the lower ECA
permissible sulphur content levels from January, 2015.
Long term, the EU aims to reduce vessel C02 emissions by up to 75%. In
other words, switching over to the use of low sulphur fuels within the
European ECAs may not be enough to satisfy EU bureaucrats, who appear to
be looking at a tougher policy, Gibson Research said in its weekly
report.
The EU wants a global approach taken to reduce shipping emissions and
proposes that from 2018, large ships using EU ports should report their
verified emissions.
In the past, the EU has acted independently from the IMO when it felt
that international legislation has been too slow in coming.
So who will be affected? The proposal is for EU regulation on
monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) of C02 emissions from all
ships larger than 5,000 gt on voyages into, out of and between EU ports.
This will be required per-voyage, as well as yearly monitoring of EU
emissions. Companies will also have to provide an emissions report for
their previous year’s activity. The MRV will be in addition to the
adoption of the technical efficiency measures introduced by the IMO in
2011, which were designed to deliver significant emission reductions.
The US authorities also appear to be taking an increasingly stricter
position with respect to their own emissions control area, Gibson
warned.
Recent orders placed at the NASSCO shipyard for Jones Act tonnage has
included two containerships and four MRs (with four options), which will
be dual fuelled (oil & LNG).
With the first delivery of these just two years away, the owners appear
confident that access to LNG fuel will not be a problem in the US, even
more so with the forecast growth of domestic gas production.
The debate on alternative fuels is heating up. As these environmental
deadlines approach, owners have some tough decisions to make in
increasingly harsh shipping markets. The only certainty is that the
emission legislation will become increasingly tougher and even more
costly to implement, Gibson concluded.
Post to be found at:
http://www.tankeroperator.com/news/emissions--unilateral-monitoring-on-the-horizon/4785.aspx
Monday, October 14, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment