ShareThis
Wordsmith - Protecting the waters of the Great Lakes must be the the first and highest priority.
Post starts here:
As tar sands extraction continues and
proposals for expanded pipelines from Canada into the U.S. form a
backdrop, the Great Lakes themselves could become the next frontier for
moving crude oil to a vast Midwest refinery network.
The region faces a critical choice about
whether the Great Lakes should become a thoroughfare for tar sands crude
shipping, a new Alliance report warns. The report finds that neither
the Great Lakes shipping fleet nor its ports were designed to ship tar
sands crude over the Great Lakes, and cites serious gaps in the region’s
oil-spill prevention and response policies.
Already, plans are in the works to
dramatically increase the flow of tar sands crude to the Midwest as
early as next year; permitting is sought for a $25 million loading dock
on Lake Superior to ship the crude in 2015; and a tar sands shipping
route has been mapped across the waters of the Great Lakes.
“We're at a crossroads now, with companies
starting to seek permits for new oil terminals,” says Lyman Welch,
director of the Alliance’s Water Quality Program and the report’s lead
author. “Before our region starts sinking money into shipping terminals
for the Great Lakes, our task should be to ask ‘if’ rather than ‘when.’”
Western Michigan residents learned
firsthand the risk of mixing tar sands oil with water in 2010 after a
cataclysmic pipeline spill in the Kalamazoo River. Three years and $1
billion-plus worth of cleanup later, more than 20 percent of the oil
spill remains at the bottom of the river: a heavy, viscous muck
synonymous with this form of crude oil.
The
report questions the rush to capitalize on the growing flow of tar sands
oil, destined for 19 U.S. and Canadian refineries on or near the Great
Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway. Enbridge, responsible for the Kalamazoo
spill and owner of pipelines to several of these refineries, plans next
year to expand its pipeline to Superior, Wis. to accommodate another
120,000 barrels per day, up from 450,000. As companies jockey to take
advantage of the demand for this unique and significantly cheaper crude,
pressures are also mounting to find economical ways to move it out --
and Great Lakes vessel shipping is emerging as a key contender.
“Great
Lakers have a track record of making smart choices as a region when the
lakes are at risk,” says Welch. “We need to pause for breath and decide
which fork in the road leads to a healthy Great Lakes.”
The report’s authors probe deeply into
whether regulators tasked with overseeing the health of the world’s
largest body of surface freshwater are prepared to safeguard the Great
Lakes from a potential tar sands crude spill, and to direct a cleanup
should disaster strike. They cite the following shortcomings:
A recent
U.S. Coast Guard and Department of Homeland Security report on
spill-response protocols for submerged oil found current methods for
locating and recovering submerged oil inadequate.
A
“Worst-Case Discharge” scenario developed by the Coast Guard involves a
Great Lakes vessel carrying a type of oil that is much different, and
less damaging to the environment, than tar sands crude.
Limited
resources are available to learn about the risk of oil spills by vessels
and oil-spill management in the region; most information about spills
is outdated or discontinued.
“The current regulatory net has far too
many holes,” the report says. “The regulatory and response framework for
petroleum shipping on the Great Lakes is not fully up to the task of
protecting the lakes from spills today, and is certainly not an adequate
starting point from which to consider the viability of tar sands crude
shipment by vessel.”
Noting the Great Lakes provide more than 40
million people with drinking water, the report stresses the importance
of strengthening efforts now to prevent a potential Great Lakes oil
spill.
Among its
recommendations are that the U.S. improve coordination among federal
agencies involved in large-scale spill prevention and response, with a
special emphasis on tar sands crude and other “submerged” oil spills.
The report also calls on Congress to increase funding for prevention,
preparedness and response programs, and on Great Lakes states to expand
and enhance state laws to prevent and better protect their shorelines
from oil-shipping spills.
For their part, the report says tar sands
crude shippers should improve safety and maintain spill-prevention and
response equipment.
“The movement of oil across water increases
the risks of oil in water, a clash in which the environment is the
loser,” the report states. “We must preface our choice of whether to
ship tar sands crude by vessel with proactively improving our oil-spill
prevention and response policies. The health of the Great Lakes is at
risk unless we take swift action.“
Post to be found at:
http://www.maritime-executive.com/article/Tar-Sands-Crude-Shipping-Meets-Great-Lakes-2013-11-22/
No comments:
Post a Comment