Posted - April 28, 2013 - Electric Power & Light 
As the world continues to face up to the effects of climate change and 
greenhouse gas emissions, the global shipping industry has been turning 
its attention to its own contribution to the problem. And a sizeable 
contribution it is too, with today's maritime CO2 emissions of around a 
billion tonnes a year accounting for three percent of the global 
emissions total. Emissions from marine transport are also predicted to 
rise to between two and three billion tonnes by 2050.
With shipping volumes expanding in step with growing global trade 
demand, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) responded to the 
emissions challenge in July 2011 with the creation of the world's first 
mandatory, global greenhouse gas reduction scheme for an entire industry
 sector.
The expanded MARPOL Annex VI is a sure sign that the winds are changing 
for marine carbon emissions, with national and international bodies such
 as the European Union starting to tighten their own emissions limits. 
The industry's focus on emissions reduction, on top of rising fuel 
costs, is spurring a new wave of carbon-efficient marine propulsion 
technologies and initiatives, including a steady shift away from heavy 
fuel oil and towards more efficient liquefied natural gas (LNG).
While today's maritime efficiency drives predominantly centre on 
incremental improvements that are feasible with present-day technologies
 and financial constraints, a few projects are looking to the future 
with more radical ideas that could shape eco-friendly shipping in 
decades to come.
One such project was recently completed by Norway's innovative 
classification society and risk management specialist Det Norske Veritas
 (DNV). The conceptual project, which was carried out in collaboration 
with UK modelling software company Process Systems Enterprise (PSE) and 
led by DNV's head of research and innovation for Greece, Dr. Nikolaos 
Kakalis, aimed to gauge the theoretical feasibility of implementing 
carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology onboard large vessels.
Carbon capture and storage is a complex, emerging process currently 
being put through its paces at various pilot power plants around the 
world. In its originally intended form, the basic CCS process involves 
the separation of CO2 from a fossil fuel power station's post-combustion
 flue gas, removing its emission from the power generation cycle and 
transmitting it for storage or industrial use.
Given that CCS is still a relatively unproven concept, even in the large
 onshore power plants it was designed for, the idea of transplanting 
this complex system to the constantly moving, space-constrained confines
 of a vessel seems ambitious in the extreme. In essence, DNV's project 
was searching for a way to take the land-based CCS process and adapt it 
to separate the CO2 from a vessel's main engine exhaust and store it for
 offloading at a port.
The advanced and hugely expensive implications of maritime CCS meant 
that DNV's feasibility project was always going to be a theoretical 
exercise, involving modelling the hypothetical design and operation of a
 ship-based CCS concept, rather than attempting to develop a physical 
prototype. Even so, Dr Kakalis notes that when DNV and PSE originally 
applied for funding from the European Commission for the project, the 
reaction was emphatic. "We got [funding] without any negotiation because
 the actual concept is very radical and innovative," he says.
DNV's research team was aware of the major challenges of the project 
from the outset. The project was simplified somewhat by taking an 
existing onshore carbon capture unit design and adapting it for maritime
 use, as well as the choice of a very large crude carrier (VLCC) as the 
hypothetical host, because of its size and relative abundance of deck 
space. Nevertheless, a number of conceptual challenges were unavoidable,
 as Kakalis explains.
"The big challenges are that you have a limited amount of space, a 
limited availability of resources, and of course the constant movement 
of the vessel," he says. "All these together create a very strong 
requirement for extra safety and risk management. That's where DNV comes
 into the game, because we are an expert when it comes to safety and 
risk management in shipping."
Fortunately, safety concerns about the storage of liquefied CO2 on a 
moving vessel turned out to be covered by DNV's existing rules and 
standards for gas carriers. Actually fitting the CCS system - mainly 
composed of two towers for CO2 separation and liquefaction, as well as 
cryogenic tanks for storage - onto a standard VLCC design represented 
the project's primary design task.
"What we managed to do was get a standard design of a chemical 
absorption carbon capture unit and scale it down, not only to fit into 
the constrained space but also to adapt it to the smaller amounts of CO2
 that are emitted in comparison to a power plant onshore," says Kakalis.
 "The first question was where to place the carbon capture unit - the 
absorption unit and the regeneration column. In this particular concept,
 we placed them aft of the funnel, so behind the accommodation space of 
the vessel, on a raised deck. This, according to our calculations, is a 
good option as there is no obstruction to the rest of the machinery 
space or any other equipment or facilities.
"The other question is where do you store the liquefied CO2? We used a 
couple of cryogenic tanks that are placed on the deck. This is a concept
 that DNV has used before in another vessel concept called DNV Triality,
 which is similar to CO2 but for LNG tanks. So placing the CO2 tanks on 
the deck and not having them inside the actual hull means that you don't
 compromise the carrying capacity of the vessel. You don't lose cargo 
space."
So DNV's finalised concept, published in February 2013, did manage to 
prove the fundamental viability of maritime CCS, at least on paper. 
Indeed, the researchers' analysis of the system's potential benefits 
yielded some impressive results - onboard CCS would reportedly be 
capable of reducing ship CO2 emissions by up to 65%, which for a VLCC 
would be the equivalent of taking more than 70,000 tonnes of CO2 out of 
the atmosphere every year.
Perhaps the most exciting advantage of the CCS concept is what could be 
done with the CO2 after it is successfully separated and stored. Given 
the expanding industrial uses for CO2, ship operators would be able to 
transform their waste exhaust into a commodity to tap into profitable 
new sectors. For example, liquid CO2 could be transmitted to the oil and
 gas industry, where it is used as an injected medium in enhanced oil 
recovery operations for ageing fields.
The option that offers the neatest environmental symmetry would be to 
sell the CO2 to the increasingly large-scale producers of eco-friendly, 
algae-based biofuels, the production of which uses CO2 as a catalyst. So
 the harmful exhaust from vessels could theoretically be recycled as a 
component in the development of green fuel for ships or other vehicles.
"I think this is the most innovative part of this project, and the whole
 idea," says Kakalis. "The fact that you emit less, so you limit your 
harm to the environment, and at the same time, you can transform these 
harmful emissions into something that is useful and that can be traded, 
can become a commodity."
But for all the system's benefits, and however theoretically possible it
 might be, DNV's CCS concept is still confined to the drawing board. 
Bringing carbon capture into the real world requires the jumping of a 
major obstacle - the huge upfront investment that would be required to 
develop a prototype, and the uncertainty that reliable markets exist to 
buy the CO2 by-product and offset that investment.
"It all comes down to the investment," Kakalis says. "Someone will need 
to go through the building of a prototype unit, find out more about the 
real cost and then see what could be a break-even selling price for the 
CO2. From what we know of onshore CCS, it costs a lot. This concept will
 require something like a more integrated value chain, so that somebody 
could present some contracts selling this CO2 to the oil and gas 
industries or to big companies that are producing algae-based biofuel. 
So someone really needs to have forward contracts to make this a 
reality."
Against the backdrop of a shipping industry that is still suffering the 
effects of the global downturn and soaring fuel prices, cautious 
shipowners clearly need time to catch up with an idea as radical as 
onboard CCS.
But DNV's project sets a solid foundation for the further development of
 the concept in the future. And as Kakalis notes, the very existence of a
 potentially revolutionary concept such as this does engender a little 
optimism for the future, both financial and environmental. "We are in 
difficult times for shipping, mainly due to the very high fuel prices 
and the pressure of [environmental] regulations. It's good to see that 
technology could bring some answers to the table."
Despite biofuels promising to be more environmentally-friendly, critics 
have condemned their efficiency, labelling the technology too immature 
to be relied upon.
The need for operationally-dependable and financially-efficient ships 
has led to rapid innovation in marine propulsion during recent years.
Copyright 2013 Progressive Media Group Limited
All Rights ReservedWire News provided by 
 
 
Post to be found at: 
http://www.elp.com/news/2013/04/26/onboard-carbon-capture-dream-or-reality.html
