Posted - August 29, 2012 - Safety4Sea
Strict EU plans to reduce sulphur emissions from ships are causing growing concern
he region's businesses are putting up a fight against proposed EU
plans that could see fuel prices rocket and have a detrimental effect
on jobs.
Strict EU plans to reduce sulphur emissions from ships are causing growing concern among businesses in the region.
Now, the Hull and Humber Chamber of Commerce's Shipping Committee
has written to Transport Minister Mike Penning expressing concerns
over the impact the limits could have on the region's shipping
industry.
Proposed new restraints on the maximum sulphur content of shipping
fuels will come into effect in 2015 and under new laws, the maximum
sulphur content of fuels used by ships operating in "sulphur emission
control areas" - which include the North Sea, the Baltic Sea and the
Channel - will be limited to 0.1 per cent.
This could be a move that would see increases in fuel costs of up to
87 per cent, bringing a serious threat to the industry and its
employees. The current limit is 1 per cent.
The chamber's committee, which represents businesses including
Associated British Ports, GXD Logistics and LV Shipping, fears impacts
could have a negative effect on a number of businesses.
Graham Cross, of Goole-based GXD Logistics and chairman of the
Shipping Committee, said the committee accepts the need to progress in
reducing the impact of existing fuel on the local environment, in terms
of air pollution and effects on health, but businesses are concerned
the proposals would come into action too quickly.
Mr Cross said: "There was no phased introduction and no level playing field - there will be issues as a result.
"There needs to be more discussions and a possible phased
introduction in conjunction with dialogue from the industries that are
going to be affected and engagement with the maritime industry to
introduce it in the correct way."
Business leaders have also highlighted concerns over plans resulting
in more trade moving by road as the cost of sea transport rises.
Mr Cross said: "We are anticipating a modal shift to transport by
road, which will lead to increased congestion, particularly around
the ports area.
"Negative consequences may also become apparent for the road haulage sector.
"Profit margins are already incredibly narrow, and with shipping
operators needing to increase their charges to customers to cover their
own increased costs, road haulage firms may see it necessary to
travel longer distances by road to shorter sea crossings."
Dominic Yeardley, of Hull's Eurovision Logistics, said the increase
could mean haulage companies lose out on business if they are forced to
pass on extra costs to customers as a result.
He said: "This proposed plan opens a whole plethora of potential problems.
"It will affect different industries in different ways but one
thing it will do is pass costs on, which is the last thing companies
need."
The Shipping Committee has also expressed concerns over the effect on tourism as a result of the plans.
P&O Ferries, which operates about 700 crossings from Hull each
year, said prices for longer routes will have to rise substantially as a
result of the plans and the business expects the overall market for
longer routes to shrink as a result.
John Garner, P&O Ferries fleet director, said the higher cost
of ultra-low sulphur fuels means an increased burden on the shipping
industry of up to £3.6 billion if the proposals come into force.
He said: "We have already called on the UK Government to act on this
issue and work with its European partners to defer the implementation
of the proposals so that a full study of the economic, social and
environmental impact can be completed.
"We welcome calls from the local business community to urge the
Government to put pressure on the European Commission for
reconsideration of the legislation."
Post to be found at:
http://www.safety4sea.com/page/12995/22/shipping-firms-to-fight-eu-emissions-proposal
thisisscunthorpe.co.uk
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment